[gmx-users] re: Gromos96 43A1

Frank Neuhaus f-neuhaus at northwestern.edu
Mon Mar 28 21:22:25 CEST 2011

I am in the process of deciding on a force field library for a MD
simulation. In reading Lemkul et al I get the impression that
GROMOS96 43A1 is probably the one to use. I am trying to do a simulation
with a ligase that  binds ADP, 2Mg, D-alanine and D-lactate.  From these
 authors, I have the impression that PRODRG  is probably not the way to go.
Are there other possibilities? or should I stick to 43A1? Comment
Frank Neuhaus 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20110328/7f8713c4/attachment.html>

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list