[gmx-users] energy group error
Gavin Melaugh
gmelaugh01 at qub.ac.uk
Tue May 10 18:04:37 CEST 2011
Hi again
To rephrase. If I have two atoms constructing a charge group, is it not
possible to have one of these atoms constructing an energy group on its own?
Cheers
Gavin
Gavin Melaugh wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have set up a topology file and with virtual sites (exerpts below),
> whereby my virtual sites only interact with the C3 atoms. I am trying to
> construct a PMF wrt one particular C3. This atom I do not want to
> interact with the virtual sites at all. I thought the best way to do
> this was via energy exclusion groups. So I set up some groups in the
> index file (see below), and defined the energy groups like so
> energygrps = vsites vsitex
> energygrp_excl = vsites vsitex
>
> but I get the following error
>
> Fatal error:
> atoms 415 and 416 in charge group 89 of molecule type 'name' are in
> different energy groups
> I have no charge group 89 in my molecule. Can someone please suggest
> where I might be going wrong.
>
> ;Parameter level
> [defaults]
> ; nbfunc comb-rule gen-pairs fudgeLJ fudgeQQ
> 1 3 yes 0.5 0.5
>
> [atomtypes]
> ;type mass charge ptype sigma(nm)
> epsilon(kjmol-1)
> CB 12.011000 0.000000 A 0.355000 0.292880
> CA 12.011000 -0.115000 A 0.355000 0.292880
> HC 1.008000 0.115000 A 0.242000 0.125520
> CU 13.019000 0.265000 A 0.350000 0.334720
> NU 14.007000 -0.597000 A 0.325000 0.711280
> CH 13.019000 0.332000 A 0.385000 0.334720
> C3 15.035000 0.000000 A 0.391000 0.669440
> C2 14.027000 0.000000 A 0.390500 0.493712
> VS 0.0 0.0 V 0.0 0.0
>
> [nonbond_params]
> ;i j funct sigma epsilon
> VS C3 1 0.1 0.03153
>
>
> [ cage_1 ]
> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
> 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
> 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45
> 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
> 61 75 89 103 117 131 145 159 173 187 201 215
> [ tail ]
> 416
> [ vsites ]
> 229 230 231 232 461 462 463 464
> [ vsitex ]
> 416
>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list