[gmx-users] decomposing the energy
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Sun May 15 03:55:39 CEST 2011
On 15/05/2011 12:01 AM, Sikandar Mashayak wrote:
> Hey Mark
>
> Do you mean removing all bond definitions from topology file, when you
> say well constructed topology to exclude all bonded-interactions in rerun?
I said you can decompose the bonded interactions. You can have none by
removing all bonded interactions, but that won't save you any
significant time, nor serve any other purpose.
Mark
>
> thanks
> sikandar
>
> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
> <mailto:Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>> wrote:
>
> On 14/05/2011 10:52 PM, XAvier Periole wrote:
>
>
> Two things you have to be careful about:
> 1- use trr trajectory files. xtc precision is not sufficient
> and it will give a lot of discrepancies at least for the
> bonded terms.
> 2- set the nstlist to 1 as the neiboring list should be
> undated for each frame and not every 5/10 as it is normally
> set in a regular mdp file.
>
>
> Reruns do neighbour searching every frame, regardless.
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> On May 14, 2011, at 1:11 PM, Justin A. Lemkul wrote:
>
>
>
> Ramachandran G wrote:
>
> Hello gmx users:
> I did 1ns simulation for my system and have the
> trajectory and energy files.
> Now i want to see the energy of some specific
> residues. So, i decompose(separated) the energy groups
> and edited the mdp file.
> Using the mdp file, i created a new tpr file and rerun
> the mdrun using the trajectory file. But when i
> compared the total energy between the old and new one,
> it differs a lot.
> I am doing some mistakes somewhere. Can anyone help me
> please. Thanks.
>
>
> Maybe, maybe not. Without seeing the .mdp settings and
> the data that you're looking at, all anyone can do is
> guess. You also haven't stated what type of trajectory
> (i.e. .xtc or .trr) you're using as -rerun input. If
> you're using an .xtc file, there is no velocity
> information, so any property related to velocities (most
> notably kinetic energy, but several others as well) will
> be zero. I suspect this is probably where the discrepancy
> is, but it is not a problem. Using energygrps is only
> useful for decomposing short-range nonbonded energy terms,
> nothing else.
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> MILES-IGERT Trainee
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu <http://vt.edu> | (540) 231-9080
> <tel:%28540%29%20231-9080>
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> ========================================
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
> posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use
> the www interface or send it to
> gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org>.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org>.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20110515/c4306be3/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list