[gmx-users] PMF when pulling in -Z direction
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Fri Nov 4 20:01:20 CET 2011
nahren manuel wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> If you observe my pulling simulation, you will see that the distances
> are (increasing) in the negative.
>
Exactly as you expect. You're pulling along the -Z dimension, as you said
before. So the ligand is pulled from the protein to an increasingly negative
position.
> Here is the PMF (image):
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/nahrenmascarenhas/6312990056/
> this is not one expects in ligand unbinding. (of course these are from
> my initial simulations, approx. 1 ns runs in 5 windows)
>
Don't base any conclusions on what you see. The simulation time and number of
windows are both woefully insufficient to make any reliable observations. Only
once you have done a proper set of umbrella sampling windows will you be able to
tell what's going on. You should also be doing error estimates when computing
the PMF; I suspect the error bars will be as wild as the values in the PMF plot.
-Justin
> Best,
> nahren
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Justin A. Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>
> *To:* nahren manuel <meetnahren at yahoo.com>; Discussion list for GROMACS
> users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, November 4, 2011 7:44 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] PMF when pulling in -Z direction
>
>
>
> nahren manuel wrote:
> > Dear Gromacs Users,
> >
> > I am trying to study ligand unbinding adopting Umbrella sampling
> (using Gmx 4.5.3). during my initial pull to generate configurations for
> umbrella windows I have pulled in the -Z direction,
> > @ s0 legend "0 Z"
> > @ s1 legend "1 dZ"
> > 0.0000 7.37361 -0.33625
> > 0.0200 7.37377 -0.33631
> > 0.0400 7.37404 -0.33637
> > 0.0600 7.3744 -0.33643
> > 0.0800 7.37473 -0.33649
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > 321.0800 7.37523 -1.29949
> > 321.1000 7.37442 -1.29955
> > 321.1200 7.37374 -1.29961
> > 321.1400 7.37355 -1.29967
> > 321.1600 7.37404 -1.29973
> > 321.1800 7.37491 -1.29979
> > 321.2000 7.3757 -1.29985
> > 321.2200 7.37608 -1.29991
> > 321.2400 7.37595 -1.29997
> > 321.2600 7.37518 -1.30003
> > 321.2800 7.37395 -1.30009
> > .
> > .
> > .(so on)
> >
> > Now when I ran simulations in each umbrella windows, the PMF energies
> are in negative. My guess is that this is due to my initial setup, or
> is there something seriously wrong. And if i am right I should get the
> correct PMF by taking the negative of this PMF (or is it)??
>
> So your PMF is negative, why is that a problem? A negative binding
> energy indicates favorability of binding.
>
> -Justin
>
> > -----
> > ; Pull code (pulling simulation)
> > pull = constraint
> > pull_geometry = distance pull_dim = N N Y
> > pull_start = yes pull_ngroups = 1
> > pull_group0 = Protein
> > pull_group1 = MAL
> > pull_rate1 = 0.005 ;
> > pull_k1 = 1000 ; kJ mol^-1 nm^-2
> > pull_nstxout = 500 ; every 1 ps
> > pull_nstfout = 500 ; every 1 ps
> >
> > -----
> >
> > ; Pull code (Umbrella simulation)
> > pull = umbrella
> > pull_geometry = distance ;
> > pull_dim = Y Y Y
> > pull_start = yes ;
> > pull_ngroups = 1
> > pull_group0 = Protein
> > pull_group1 = MAL
> > pull_rate1 = 0.000 ;
> > pull_k1 = 1000 ; kJ mol^-1 nm^-2
> > pull_nstxout = 500 ; every 1 ps
> > pull_nstfout = 500 ; every 1 ps
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > nahren
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> -- ========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul
> Ph.D. Candidate
> ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
> MILES-IGERT Trainee
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> ========================================
>
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list