[gmx-users] Topology dihedral or improper dihedral
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon Nov 14 04:17:48 CET 2011
XUEMING TANG wrote:
> Thank you for your reply, Lina. I did try the prodrg server before. For
> A molecule, there is no improper dihedral. A just has one dihedral for
> the head group. For B molecule, it gives improper dihedral of the tetra
> nitrogen. I am wondering what is the criteria or at least a guidance of
> what could be the best choice for the topology file. Or any choices
> could be right and I have to try which one provide consistent results
> with experiment by trial?
>
I see no reason why a quaternary nitrogen would need an improper dihedral
assigned to it. Some impropers in Gromos96 are applied to tetrahedral groups
like alpha-carbons because there is no explicit H atom present, thus the
stereochemistry is maintained with an improper so that the groups do not invert.
With four explicit substituents, an improper should not be necessary.
-Justin
> Best!
> Xueming
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:57 AM, lina <lina.lastname at gmail.com
> <mailto:lina.lastname at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:26 AM, XUEMING TANG <yujan2007 at gmail.com
> <mailto:yujan2007 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > Hi there
> >
> > I am trying to build up a topology file for a tetra nitrogen
> molecule using
> > Gromos UA and OPLS UA force field. Following are the molecules.
> >
> > 1. for C
> > |
> > A. C-C-C-C-C-C-C-N-C and
> > |
> > C
> >
> > C
> > |
> > B. C-C-C-C-C-C-C-N-C-C-C-C-COOH
> > |
> > C
> >
> > I have several questions:
> >
> > For A, the first molecule, should I use improper dihedral for the
> N-(CH3)3
> > or proper dihedral for C-C-N-C with multi 3 for the head group?
> Is there any
> > differences when using different force field (GROMOS and OPLS-UA)?
> > For B, the second molecule, should I use improper dihedral for
> the N-(CH3)3
> > or proer dihedral for C-C-N-C with multi 2? Is there any
> differences when
> > using different force field (GROMOS UA and OPLS UA)?
> >
> > The first expression about improper didedral is a planer
> restriction. When
> > read the manual it also refers to the tetrahedral structure like
> this tetra
> > nitrogen functional group. My question is when it has
> > really long hydrocarbon tail, I guess it will be hard to flip over to
> > the mirror images. Or it is not true in the simulation?
>
> You may take one built by other server, such as
> http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/prodrg/
>
> as reference, and built yourself if necessary.
> >
> > Thank you very much!!!
> >
> > Best!
> > Xueming
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org>.
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org>.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list