[gmx-users] Positive potential energy for TFE solvent

[Harpreet Basra]

Hi


I am still stuck with same problem of obtaining positive potential energy.

>>On 11/11/2011 5:07 PM, Harpreet Basra wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am trying to generate an equilibrated box of 216 TFE molecules.To
>> generate the 216 TFE molecule box i performed following steps:
>
>A suggested workflow can be found here
>http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/How-tos/Non-Water_Solvation

I have been following this link only.

>
>
>> 1) I got the tfe.gro file and created a cubic box of edge length =
>> 0.516 nm containing 1 TFE molecule (at its center), using the
>> following command:
>>
>>>> editconf -f tfe.gro -c -o tfe_box.gro -bt cubic -box 0.516
>>  I chose this length because in the tfe.gro file dimensions of the TFE
>> molecule are 0.516 0.516 0.516.
>
>That's not a good reason. Choose a volume and shape that makes sense for
>your target density. Cubic probably doesn't make sense when a
>rectangular shape is possible. Then you'll probably want to choose -nbox
>differently later.

I chose a rectangular box too. still i get a positive value for PE and
moreover all the molecules move towards two opposite walls of the box. I am
not sure that the way I am using the genconf command is the correct way.
because I have tried every other possibility for not getting a positive
potential, with no success. So here are my .gro file and the topology file
for TFE.

*****tfe.gro file*****

 7

1TFE   F1T   1   0.444   0.344   0.246

1TFE   CT     2   0.334  0.245   0.246

1TFE   F2T    3   0.350  0.160   0.364

1TFE   F3T    4   0.350  0.160   0.127

1TFE   CH2T  5  0.187  0.326   0.246

1TFE   OT      6  0.075  0.220   0.246

1TFE   HT      7  -0.019 0.266   0.246

0.49174   0.49174   0.49174



****topology file****

[ moleculetype ]

; Name nrexcl

TFE 3

[ atoms ]

; nr type resnr resid atom cgnr charge mass

1 FTFE    1  TFE  F1T   1   -0.170   18.9984

2 CTFE    1  TFE  CT    1    0.452   12.0110

3 FTFE    1  TFE  F2T   1   -0.170   18.9984

4 FTFE    1  TFE  F3T   1   -0.170   18.9984

5 CHTFE 1  TFE  CH2T 1    0.273   14.0270

6 OTFE   1  TFE  OT     1   -0.625   15.9994

7 H          1  TFE  HT     1   0.410   1.0080

[ bonds ]

; ai aj fu c0, c1, ...

2 1 2 0.133 3380866.9 0.133 3380866.9 ; C1 F1

2 3 2 0.133 3380866.9 0.133 3380866.9 ; C1 F2

2 4 2 0.133 3380866.9 0.133 3380866.9 ; C1 F3

2 5 2 0.153 7150000.0 0.153 7150000.0 ; C1 C2

5 6 2 0.143 8180000.0 0.143 8180000.0 ; C2 O

6 7 2 0.100 15700000.0 0.100 15700000.0 ; O H

[ pairs ]

; ai aj fu c0, c1, ...

1 6 1 ; F1 O

2 7 1 ; C1 H

3 6 1 ; F2 O

4 6 1 ; F3 O

[ angles ]

; ai aj ak fu c0, c1, ...

1 2 3 2 109.5 520.0 109.5 520.0 ; F1 C1 F2

1 2 4 2 109.5 520.0 109.5 520.0 ; F1 C1 F3

1 2 5 2 109.5 520.0 109.5 520.0 ; F1 C1 C2

3 2 4 2 109.5 520.0 109.5 520.0 ; F2 C1 F3

3 2 5 2 109.5 520.0 109.5 520.0 ; F2 C1 C2

4 2 5 2 109.5 520.0 109.5 520.0 ; F3 C1 C2

2 5 6 2 109.5 520.0 109.5 520.0 ; C1 C2 O

5 6 7 2 109.5 450.0 109.5 450.0 ; C2 O H

[ dihedrals ]

; ai aj ak al fu c0, c1, m, ...

6 5 2 1 1 0.0 5.9 3 0.0 5.9 3 ; dih O C2 C1 F1

2 5 6 7 1 0.0 1.3 3 0.0 1.3 3 ; dih C1 C2 O H

and to construct a box of TFE solvent i took the tfe.gro file and
replicated the TFE molecule by using


genconf -f tfe.gro -o tfe_sol.gro -rot -nbox 6


can u plz suggest is it that I am using genconf in a wrong way that it is
causing this problem? I am not sure how many molecules (-nbox option in
genconf) should i keep in the box in order to get a mass density of 1383g/L
for TFE.

thanks

Harpreet

>
>> 2) Then using genconf command i replicated the box to get a bigger box
>> with 216 TFE molecules using the following command:
>>
>>>> genconf -f tfe_box.gro  -o out.gro -rot -nbox 6
>> 3) Energy minimization was done using STEEPEST descent
>>
>> 4) Then I performed 5ns NVT (300K) equilibration and followed by 5ns
>> NPT (300K, 1atm) equilibration.
>>
>> After doing all these steps still I obtain a positive a potentail
>> energy. I get positive potential energy of the system (2.45+E04
>> kJ/mol) and kinetic energy as 4.03+E03 kJ/mol, thus giving a positive
>> total energy of the system. My question is whether obtaining positive
>> potential energy indicate some error in my TFE solvent box ? Is it
>> because of large Fluorine atoms of TFE ? Does it mean its not properly
>> equilibrated ? What can I do to equilibrate it?
>
>You probably have atomic overlaps from your choice of cubic 0.516 box
>earlier. Did you look at the results of genconf before computing with them?
>
>Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20111115/9aed0156/attachment.html>