[gmx-users] import force field

[Mark Abraham]

On 16/11/2011 5:00 AM, Liu, Liang wrote:
> The tabulated potentials I am using is non-bonded interactions. The 
> question is the application of these potentials will only modify the 
> force field, e.g. amber03, or will take place of the force field?

The force field is more than the non-bonded interactions. So the use of 
tables for some non-bonded potentials modifies those parts of the force 
field. You will have a significant burden of proof that such a 
modification is valid.

Mark

>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au 
> <mailto:Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>> wrote:
>
>     On 15/11/2011 9:33 AM, Liu, Liang wrote:
>>     I have a serial of tabulated potentials with the name of *.xvg,
>>     which are the function of atom distance.
>>     I am wondering how to use them in gromacs simulation? Will that
>>     replace the force field, e.g. amber03? Thanks.
>
>     There are sections in the manual that describe the use of
>     tabulated potentials for either bonded or non-bonded interactions.
>     Such tables modify the force field in the expected manner.
>
>     Mark
>
>     --
>     gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>     <mailto:gmx-users at gromacs.org>
>     http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>     Please search the archive at
>     http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>     Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>     www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org
>     <mailto:gmx-users-request at gromacs.org>.
>     Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Best,
> Liang Liu
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20111117/b378fc35/attachment.html>