[gmx-users] difference in force fields.
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Fri Nov 18 06:18:32 CET 2011
swati patel wrote:
> helo justin,
>
> yess since i am dealing with a complex,so i generated protein topology
> using gromos96 43a1 force fields and for ligands,obtained topology using
> PRODRG which uses gromos 87 force fields.
>
> How to obtain similar force fields topologies since PRODRG only works
> with gromos87 force fields and in gromacs i choosed optipn (9)i.e.gromos
> 96 force fields.??
>
This is not true. There is a newer PRODRG server that creates topologies for
Gromos96. Their quality is not particularly high, as noted on this list on a
weekly basis, and in the literature. Please see the paper linked from:
http://www.gromacs.org/Downloads/Related_Software/PRODRG#Tips
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list