[gmx-users] Question about adding hydrogens to a newly constructed residue
Mark Abraham
Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au
Sun Sep 4 19:51:31 CEST 2011
On 5/09/2011 3:30 AM, J. Nathan Scott wrote:
> Hello fellow GROMACS users,
>
> I am in the process of constructing a new residue in the OPLS-AA force
> field for the mCherry chromophore. However, I am having some
> difficulty in adding three CH3 hydrogens. In the 2H5Q PDB structure
> the chromophore residue, CH6, has CE1 and CE2 ring carbons defined,
> but also an extended chain carbon named CE. The problem is that my hdb
> rules were assigning HE1 and HE2 to the ring carbon hydrogens (1
> 1 HE1 CE1 CD1 CZ for example), and HE1, HE2, and HE3
> to the CE carbon hydrogens (3 4 HE CE SD
> CG1). Since these hydrogens are of different types, I need to have
> them named distinctly in my RTP file and need for Gromacs to
> understand them as different types. I changed the CH6 residue's CE
> atom to CE3 in the PDB file and the relevant RTP entries accordingly
> (see below). I also changed the hdb entry for the new CE3 atom (also
> below).
>
> Relevant RTP lines:
> CE3 opls_209 0.0 10
> HE31 opls_140 0.0 11
> HE32 opls_140 0.0 12
> HE33 opls_140 0.0 13
> CE1 opls_145 0.0 32
> HE1 opls_146 0.0 33
> CE2 opls_145 0.0 34
> HE2 opls_146 0.0 35
> [bonds]
> CE3 HE31
> CE3 HE32
> CE3 HE33
> CE1 HE1
> CE2 HE2
>
> Relevant HDB lines:
> 3 4 HE3 CE3 SD CG1
> 1 1 HE1 CE1 CD1 CZ
> 1 1 HE2 CE2 CD2 CZ
>
> I thought this would cover everything, but I am receiving the
> following sort of error from pdb2gmx for each of the the three CE3
> hydrogens(pdb2gmx -f 2H5Q.pdb -o 2H5Q_processed.gro -water tip3):
>
> "WARNING: atom HE31 is missing in residue CH6 66 in the pdb file
> You might need to add atom HE31 to the hydrogen database of
> building block CH6
> in the file aminoacids.hdb (see the manual)"
>
> I've looked at other examples in the aminoacids.hdb file and cannot
> figure out what I am missing here, it seems like my hdb rule should be
> adding 3 type 4 hydrogens named HE31, HE32, and HE33. I am assuming
> that the other hdb rules are OK, since they seemed to work fine
> before, as indicated by examining the gro file. I would sincerely
> appreciate any help you can offer. Thank you!
I can't see a reason why that wouldn't work. However, there's no need
for you to preserve the PDB atom name for CE. Reducing the potential for
some atom-naming screw-up such as this is a good reason to change it (in
both your coordinate file and .rtp entry). It will probably just work,
or at the very least simplify further trouble-shooting.
Mark
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list