[gmx-users] SS bond forcing
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue Apr 10 16:17:52 CEST 2012
Pierre THEVENET wrote:
> In most cases (it is form predicted structures) if the bonds is not
> formes, the S atoms are at the opposite side of the backbone. And I work
> on peptides, so the length of the structure isn't that big (50 residues max)
>
Well, if you try the distance restraint approach, I'd do it in the absence of
any solvent since there likely will be rather large structural changes (and thus
very fast protein-solvent clashes as the restraints are satisfied), unless the
peptide is pretty compact. Really short MD should tell you if this will even be
feasible.
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list