[gmx-users] Box generation for monoclinic crystal - regd
ramesh cheerla
rameshgromacs at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 22:17:03 CEST 2012
Dear Tsjerk,
Thank you for your reply, I will try to work with PDB format and get back
to you.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar <tsjerkw at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Ramesh,
>
> Maybe it is easier, and less error-prone, to work in PDB format,
> specifying the box as a CRYST1 record. You can use the PDB format
> anywhere in your workflow where GRO format is used.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tsjerk
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:13 PM, ramesh cheerla <rameshgromacs at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Dear Mark,
> >
> > Thank you for reply, sorry for not being very clear, Here
> my
> > doubt is can i use triclinic box for the simulations of the crystal
> whose
> > unit cell is monoclinic. As i said earlier i have tried editconf as
> > editconf -f input.gro -o out_box1.gro -bt triclinic -box 3.22 2.608
> 7.792
> > -angles 90 125.4 90
> > it gave the following warning
> >
> > WARNING: Triclinic box is too skewed.
> >
> > for clarity here i am sending a part of the output file generated by the
> > editconf
> > God Rules Over Mankind, Animals, Cosmos and Such
> > 6528
> > 1PEGA C1 1 -0.025 0.408 -0.045
> > 1PEGA C2 2 -0.015 0.326 0.084
> > ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;
> > 3.22000 2.60800 6.35148 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000
> > -4.51376 -0.00000
> > if i change the angles while using the editconf i observed the following
> > changes
> >
> > editconf -f input.gro -o out_box2.gro -bt triclinic -box 3.22 2.608
> 7.792
> > -angles 90 90 125.4
> > in this case editconf haven't given any warning and the output as follows
> >
> > God Rules Over Mankind, Animals, Cosmos and Such
> > 6528
> > 1PEGA C1 1 1.477 0.167 0.675
> > 1PEGA C2 2 1.487 0.085 0.804
> > ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;
> > 3.22000 2.12585 7.79200 0.00000 0.00000 -1.51077 0.00000
> > -0.00000 -0.00000
> >
> > Can you please help me in this regard.
> >
> > thank you in advance.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Ap;r 9, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/04/2012 3:22 PM, ramesh cheerla wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Dear Gromacs users,
> >>>
> >>> I am planing to simulate a polymeric crystal
> in
> >>> gromacs, which is of monoclinic unit cell with cell parameters a =
> 0.805 nm
> >>> b = 1.304 nm and c = 1.948 nm and beta = 125.4 deg. my crystal is of
> 424
> >>> type i.e 4 unit cells along 'a' direction '2' unit cells along 'b'
> >>> direction and 4 unit cells along 'c' direction.
> >>> So my box vector lengths are a = 3.22 nm, b = 2.608 nm, c = 7.792 nm.
> >>> I am using editconf to generate box for this crystal as:
> >>>
> >>> editconf -f input.gro -o out_box.gro -bt tric -box 3.22 2.608 7.792
> >>> -angles 90 125.4 90
> >>>
> >>> Here i have some doubts:
> >>>
> >>> 1) Am i using the editconf in correct manner for generation of box for
> >>> the monoclinic crystal, though the crystal is of monoclinic i am
> using box
> >>> type as triclinic
> >>> i haven't found any specific method for the generation of box for the
> >>> monoclinic crystal.
> >>> 2) Is there any specific method to generate the box for the monoclinic
> >>> crystals.
> >>> 3) The notations for the lattice parameters of the crystal i.e 'a' ,
> 'b'
> >>> , 'c' and angles alpha, beta , gamma used by crystallography and the
> gromacs
> >>> editconf are the same or different, why because if i use editconf as
> above i
> >>> am getting the following warning:
> >>>
> >>> WARNING: Triclinic box is too skewed.
> >>
> >>
> >> This means equation 3.3 of the manual is not true. Maybe beta should be
> >> acute? I've no idea of necessity or convention here.
> >>
> >> Inspecting the whole output of editconf is probably instructive, but
> >> you've kept all that information to yourself instead of re-thinking how
> your
> >> repeat post might be constructed so as to make it easier / more likely
> for
> >> people help you. Likewise the final line of out_box.gro. Make sure you
> have
> >> read and understood what documentation is available with editconf -h
> and in
> >> manual section 3.2.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >> --
> >> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> >> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> >> Please search the archive at
> >> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> >> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> >> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
>
>
> --
> Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
>
> post-doctoral researcher
> Molecular Dynamics Group
> * Groningen Institute for Biomolecular Research and Biotechnology
> * Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
> University of Groningen
> The Netherlands
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20120411/a85b1b27/attachment.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list