[gmx-users] Re: Re: NPT simulation with parinello-rahman pressure coupling
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Apr 11 19:22:08 CEST 2012
Shyno Mathew wrote:
> Hello Justin,
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> Yes, absolutely. The Berendsen method leads to faster convergence, while
> Parrinello-Rahman often fluctuates to a larger extent before settling around the
> target pressure values. It is not suitable for equilibration, generally. Have
>
> you done prior equilibration for this system?
>
> Actually, this run is an equilibration. So I guess for pressure
> coupling, it is good to use Berendsen for equilibration rather than PR?
>
Yes.
> Also note that you're not providing several important parameters in your
>
> pressure coupling section, like reference pressures and compressibilities. With
> anisotropic pressure coupling, you should make sure that the off-diagonal
> components are not causing compression or distortion of your system, as the
>
> manual advises.
>
> Yes, these parameters are there in the .mdp file (as shown below), in
> the previous email, I didn't include them.
> pcoupl = Parrinello-Rahman
> pcoupltype = anisotropic
> nstpcouple = -1
> tau_p = 1.0
> compressibility = 4.6e-5 4.6e-5 4.6e-5 0 0 0
> ref_p = 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
>
Always make sure to include full information. It will help us figure out
potential problems faster, rather than guess, which then gets you a resolution
faster ;)
-Justin
--
========================================
Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
========================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list