[gmx-users] Gromos87

[Shima Arasteh]

Dear friends,

I'd like to use gormos87 force field in my simulation. Which force field am I supposed to select?

 1: AMBER03 protein, nucleic AMBER94 (Duan et al., J. Comp. Chem. 24, 1999-2012, 2003)
 2: AMBER94 force field (Cornell et al., JACS 117, 5179-5197, 1995)
 3: AMBER96 protein, nucleic AMBER94 (Kollman et al., Acc. Chem. Res. 29, 461-469, 1996)
 4: AMBER99 protein, nucleic AMBER94 (Wang et al., J. Comp. Chem. 21, 1049-1074, 2000)
 5: AMBER99SB protein, nucleic AMBER94 (Hornak et al., Proteins 65, 712-725, 2006)
 6: AMBER99SB-ILDN protein, nucleic AMBER94 (Lindorff-Larsen et al., Proteins 78, 1950-58, 2010)
 7: AMBERGS force field (Garcia & Sanbonmatsu, PNAS 99, 2782-2787, 2002)
 8: CHARMM27 all-atom force field (with CMAP) - version 2.0
 9: GROMOS96 43a1 force field
10: GROMOS96 43a2 force field (improved alkane dihedrals)
11: GROMOS96 45a3 force field (Schuler JCC 2001 22 1205)
12: GROMOS96 53a5 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
13: GROMOS96 53a6 force field (JCC 2004 vol 25 pag 1656)
14: OPLS-AA/L all-atom force field (2001 aminoacid dihedrals)
15: [DEPRECATED] Encad all-atom force field, using full solvent charges
16: [DEPRECATED] Encad all-atom force field, using scaled-down vacuum charges
17: [DEPRECATED] Gromacs force field (see manual)
18: [DEPRECATED] Gromacs force field with hydrogens for NMR

Thanks in advance,
Shima
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20120412/c31f7442/attachment.html>