[gmx-users] Re: force autocorrelation

[Keith]

Thanks, couldn't see the wood for the trees. Clear as daylight now.


On 11/12/12 19:39, Mark Abraham wrote:
> Yes. Read about analysis groups in chapter 8.
>
> Mark
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 8:20 PM, khuws <khuws at khuws.plus.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Thanks,
>> I forgot to mention that I need the force autocorrelation for the forces
>> acting on a single atom. Will the method
>>
>> 1. Run mdrun with nstfout set appropriately
>> 2. g_traj -h
>> 3. g_analyze -h
>>
>>
>> work here
>>
>> Keith
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/force-autocorrelation-tp5003656p5003663.html
>> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>>