[gmx-users] Charge fitting
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Sun Jan 1 10:36:37 CET 2012
On 2012-01-01 10:11, parto haghighi wrote:
> Dear GMX usesr,
>
> I have to do charge fitting for a small molecule like ethanol.
> I have applied PRODRG to generate .gro and .itp for ethanol but it has
> wrong atomic charge.
> To correct it I have to use gromos 43a1 force field parameters to assign
> charges on each atom (Is it right?)
Check this paper for gromos96 compatible stuff:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct200196m
For OPLS/GAFF please check
http://virtualchemistry.org/
>
> I have red a paper ( Practical Considerations for Building
> GROMOS-Compatible Small-Molecule Topologies
> Justin A. Lemkul, William J. Allen, and David R. Bevan*) about this
> issue. In this paper they assign these value to each atom:
>
> H3C 0.000
> CH2 0.150
> O -0.548
> H 0.398
>
> My question is:
> In a gromos 43a1 force field and in .rtp file for CH3 in ALA and TMP:
>
> [ ALA ]
> [ atoms ]
> N N -0.28000 0
> H H 0.28000 0
> _*CA CH1 0.00000 1
> CB CH3 0.00000 1*_
> C C 0.380 2
> O O -0.380 2
>
> [ TMP ]
> [ atoms ]
> N1 NR -0.36000 0
> C2 C 0.36000 0
> NA2 NT -0.83000 1
> .
> .
> .
> _* CM13 CH3 0.18000 6*_
> C15 C 0.18000 7
> O15 OA -0.36000 7
> *_ CM15 CH3 0.18000 7_*
> C14 C 0.18000 8
> O14 OA -0.36000 8
> *_ CM14 CH3 0.18000 8_*
>
> and for atom O I have same problem:
>
> [ ADE ]
> [ atoms ]
> P P 0.99000 0
> O1P OM -0.63500 0
> O2P OM -0.63500 0
> *_O5* OA -0.36000 0_*
> C5* CH2 0.00000 1.
> .
> .
>
> *_O2* OA -0.54800 8_*
> H2* H 0.39800 8
> C3* CH1 0.000 9
> *_O3* OA -0.360 10_*
>
> So I am confused which one of these charges must be considered as a
> correct charge when I dont have a reference like mentioned paper?
>
> Thanks in advance.
> P.Haghighi
>
>
--
David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205.
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se http://folding.bmc.uu.se
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list