[gmx-users] Model N2 molecules

Kiwoong Kim ilmarekw at gmail.com
Fri Jan 20 15:21:45 CET 2012


AFAIUI, when model CO2 molecules, at least two dummy particle should
present to make CO2 linear-triatomic molecules along with the quadrupole
moment. If there exists better way, I have to change CO2 model of mine.

Thank you Mark and David :)

2012/1/20 Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>

>  On 21/01/2012 12:40 AM, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
>
> Hi, Mark.
>
> I'am very grateful to your reply.
>
> I'm sorry not to keep the archive. Actually, I didn't know how to directly
> append the reply to the original post because I posted the
> previous question under the disabled-subscribed status. I haven't found the
> way to post the reply such status so far.
>
> I will try to model N2 like you did mention. (two N atom (Atom type: A),
> Dummy single N2 molecule (Atom type: V) between N atoms)
>
> When I modeled CO2 (linear rigid body), I used below manner.
>
>  > [ atomtypes ]
> > ;   type      mass    charge    ptype       c6            c12
> >     D1         22.004975        0.0000       A         0.0000
> 0.00000000
> >     D2          22.004975       0.0000       A         0.0000
> 0.00000000
> >     C_CO     0.0000000          0.5406       V         0.0000
> 0.00000000
> >     O_CO     0.0000000         -0.2703       V         0.29847
> 1.10765301
> >
> > [ moleculetype ]
> > ; name  nrexcl
> > CO2         2
> >
> > [ atoms ]
> > ;   nr  type    resnr   residu  atom    cgnr    charge        mass
> > 1       D1       1       CO2    DUM       1        0.0000  22.004975
> > 2       D2       1       CO2    DUM       1        0.0000  22.004975
>
>
> Here the two dummy atoms are used to give the rigid CO2 the moments of
> inertia of a diatomic molecule. Whether that's reasonable would have to be
> seen in the results there...
>
> Mark
>
>
>  > 3       C_CO     1       CO2    C_CO      1        0.5406  0.0000000
> > 4       O_CO     1       CO2    O_CO      1       -0.2703  0.0000000
> > 5       O_CO     1       CO2    O_CO      1       -0.2703  0.0000000
> >
> > [ constraints ]
> > ;  ai  aj funct           c0           c1
> > 1       2     1          0.2006146447
> >
> > [ virtualsites2]
> > ;  ai    aj    ak       funct   c0      c1
> >      3     1     2       1       0.4263443
> >      4     1     2       1      -0.07365569
> >      5     1     2       1       0.926344308
> >
> > [ exclusions ]
> > 4 3 5
> > 5 3 4
> > 3 5 4
>  Thanks Mark again. :)
>
> Have a great day.
>  2012/1/20 Mark Abraham <Mark.Abraham at anu.edu.au>
>
>>  On 21/01/2012 12:04 AM, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>>
>> Please do keep the discussion on the list, so others can learn and
>> contribute now and from the archives.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I don’t know how to model N2 molecule yet.
>>
>>  If I use virtual site for N2 model, then, this can be done like below.
>>
>>  Hence, where do I have to apply plus charge for making N2 neutral??
>>
>> Can it be D1 and D2 for plus charge??
>>
>>
>>  Why are you creating two dummy atoms? Your earlier post implied two
>> negatively charged N atoms and a single (axial) positively-charged massless
>> dummy atom would be an adequate model. The two N atoms have a bond or
>> constraint between them, and the dummy atom is a type 2 virtual site
>> half-way between them. IIRC this should be the same for linear rigid CO2,
>> except that there the central particle has mass and charge.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>    Thx.
>>
>>  [ atomtypes ]
>>
>> ; type mass charge ptype sigma epsilon
>>
>>  D1 14.00674 0.0000 A 0.0000 0.00000000
>>
>>  D2 14.00674 0.0000 A 0.0000 0.00000000
>>
>>  N 0.0000000 -0.4048 V 0.332 0.3026
>>
>>   [ moleculetype ]
>>
>>  ; name  nrexcl
>>
>>  N2         2
>>
>>   [ atoms ]
>>
>>  ;   nr  type    resnr   residu  atom    cgnr    charge        mass
>>
>>  1       D1       1       N2    D1       1        0.0000  14.00674
>>
>>  2       D2       1       N2    D2       1        0.0000  14.00674
>>
>>  3       N        1       N2    N        1       -0.4048  0.0000000
>>
>>  4       N        1       N2    N        1       -0.4048  0.0000000
>>
>>  [ constraints ]
>>
>>  ;  ai  aj funct           c0           c1
>>
>>  1       2     1          0.1098
>>
>>   [ virtualsites2]
>>
>>  ;  ai    aj    ak       funct   c0      c1
>>
>>       3     1     2       1       -0.5
>>
>>       4     1     2       1        0.5
>>
>>   [ exclusions ]
>>
>> 3 4
>>
>> 4 3
>>
>>
>>
>> Below is the previous post message
>>
>> On 20/01/2012 5:51 PM, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> I asked this question before.
>> Thanks to Justin, he did reply as follows.
>>
>> Kiwoong Kim wrote:
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     I'm getting better to use Gromacs owing to many posts on this sites :) .
>>
>>     I have several questions about adding the counter-ions.
>>
>>
>>     My system has a number of N2 molecules which has charge,
>>     -0.40484(for single N) X 2.
>>
>>     Thus, I have to add some counter-ions to make the system neutral.
>>
>>
>>     However, because I'm newbie on Gromacs, I thought of several
>>     clumsy ways myself.
>>
>>     #1. Add virtual sites (virtual atoms) which has counter-ions like below.
>>
>>     [ atomtypes ]
>>     ; name  mass   charge  ptype  sigma  epsilon
>>     DUM     0        0.80968 V    0.0    0.0
>>
>>
>>     I set the coordinates of each virtual DUM atoms to the center of
>>     N2 molecules.
>>
>>     #2. using genion in Gromacs.
>>
>>
>>     But, I have no idea on this. What molecules do I have to designate
>>     to charge plus ion using genion ??
>>
>>     I typed below line.
>>
>>     genion -s md_0_1.tpr -n index.ndx -o ton_genion.pdb -g
>>     md_0_1_genion.log -p topol_genion.top -np 322 -pname dum -pq 0.80968
>>
>>     and selected N2 molecules which is diffusing particle.
>>
>>
>>     It results that the name of half of N2 molecules is changed as
>>     DUM. (maybe the system become neutral)
>>
>>     The number of N2 molecules should be fixed.
>>
>>     Do I have additional N2 molecule for charging using genion?? Then,
>>     what are the initial coordinates???
>>
>>     please help me....
>>
>>     any advises would be helpful.
>>
>>
>>  How can I do that??? I see no reason why you should do either. For
>> dinitrogen, which has no net dipole, it seems intuitive to me that both
>> N atoms should have zero charge.
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>> I made linear rigid model (CO2) by introducing virtual interaction. However, I
>> have troubles in modelling N2 molecules.
>> I want to model N2 with quadrupole moment according to the paper (Adsorption
>> (2007) 13: 469-476).
>> In the paper, the charge N2 model (originally developed by Murthy et al. (1980)
>> can be described as follows.
>> N (-0.40484), Dummy (N2, +0.80968).
>>
>>  Right... that's totally different from N2 with charged N atoms :)
>>
>>
>>  Actually, I don't know how to model N2 molecules with dummy. Please let me know
>> any advises.
>>
>>  Sounds like virtual site type 2 is perfect - and didn't you already use that
>> for CO2? See section 4.7 and somewhere in chapter 5.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>  Thx. Have a great day. :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/attachments/20120120/1a35660d/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list