[gmx-users] Wildcards and dihedral type 9
hanne.antila at aalto.fi
Fri Jan 27 08:22:04 CET 2012
I'm a bit confused about the use wildcards in the dihedral definitions
of .itp force field files. I'm under the impression that explicit
definition of a dihedral (e.g. OS-CT-CT-OS) is always used if
available and it overwrites any wildcards (for example X-CT-CT-X) that
might match that particular dihedral. However:
1. Does the explicit definition replace wildcard if they have
different periodicity. That is, are the expressions matched based on
atom types alone or atom types and periodicity?
2. Does the use of dihedral type 9, which enables summation of several
(type 1) dihedrals, have an effect on this?
Thanks for the help!
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users