[gmx-users] root-mean-square distance
tsjerkw at gmail.com
Sun Jan 29 11:32:44 CET 2012
g_rms calculates the RMS from pairwise distances after performing a
least-squares fit. That's quite different from what you want, and
actually is what you get from g_gyrate...
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 8:09 AM, dina dusti <dinadusti at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Dear Specialists,
> I have a problem about computing of radius of micelle by
> root-mean-square-distance. Please help me.
> I obtained radius of my micelle 2.4 nm by g_gyrate.
> g_gyrate -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o gyrate.xvg -b 150000
> I want compare it by rms distance.
> I use from g_rms as following:
> g_rms -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -o distrmsd.xvg -n index.ndx -b 150000
> It result me 3.992290e+00 nm after averaging by g_analyze -f distrmsd.xvg
> (the radius of a spherical micelle is defined as the rms distance of the
> headgroup atoms from the micelle center of mass, how should I define com of
> micelle in g_rms?)
> I think I am wrong somewhere.
> May I ask you to help me,Please?
> Best Regards
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
Molecular Dynamics Group
* Groningen Institute for Biomolecular Research and Biotechnology
* Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials
University of Groningen
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users