[gmx-users] Re: pdb2gmx error
Justin A. Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Jun 27 20:02:06 CEST 2012
On 6/27/12 1:58 PM, Shima Arasteh wrote:
> Dear Shounak,
> So what's about the FOR residue? I can't eliminate it. I guess if I do as you suggest, I need to add the FOR to n.tdb and then the procedure would be different!
You do not need to add FOR to a .tdb entry. These directives are only to modify
protonation states of amines and carboxylates. I believe you tried this before,
and my comment was that such a procedure would not work (and it didn't).
> Yes, I added the FOR to rtp file on my own.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: shounakb <baners4 at rpi.edu>
> To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 10:22 PM
> Subject: [gmx-users] Re: pdb2gmx error
> Shima, I use gromacs-4.5.4. Without the FOR residue, my gmx.ff/aminoacids.rtp
> file works fine for the sequence you originally specified. (pdb2gmx executes
> without any errors)
> I guess you added the FOR cap's topology yourself?
> Justin, could this be an issue?
> View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/pdb2gmx-error-tp4998845p4998861.html
> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Department of Biochemistry
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users