[gmx-users] Re: difference between the tabulated and Cut-off Electicstatics potentials
xiaowu759 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 05:16:24 CEST 2012
Sorry to all that pays attention to my previous post. When I looked into the
generated mdp files, I find that except the ele. potentials there is another
difference in the running parameters, namely cut-off. Now I am sure that it
is different cut-off that causes that big difference in stablized density,
which has been confirmed by another test using the same cut-off. However, I
am quite puzzling about why one different cut-off (1.0 vs. 1.26 nm) generate
such big difference and whether the cut-off value should match the one in
the tabulated potential at which the potential is zero. Could you give me
some hints, please?
View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/difference-between-the-tabulated-and-Cut-off-Electicstatics-potentials-tp5001754p5001769.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users