[gmx-users] Re: difference between the tabulated and Cut-off Electicstatics potentials

xiaowu759 xiaowu759 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 8 05:16:24 CEST 2012

Dear gmxers,
Sorry to all that pays attention to my previous post. When I looked into the
generated mdp files, I find that except the ele. potentials there is another
difference in the running parameters, namely cut-off. Now I am sure that it
is different cut-off that causes that big difference in stablized density,
which has been confirmed by another test using the same cut-off. However, I
am quite puzzling about why one different cut-off (1.0 vs. 1.26 nm) generate
such big difference and whether the cut-off value should match the one in
the tabulated potential at which the potential is zero. Could you give me
some hints, please?
Yours sincerely,
Chaofu Wu

View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.n6.nabble.com/difference-between-the-tabulated-and-Cut-off-Electicstatics-potentials-tp5001754p5001769.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list