AW: [gmx-users] question about the minimization

reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
Thu Oct 18 13:05:45 CEST 2012


Hi Justin,

I already read the page you send me.
And I am sure about the first points. But I am not completely sure about
the mdp file for the nvt run.

It looks like this:

define               = -DPOSRES
integrator           = md
dt                   = 0.002
nsteps               = 10000
nstxout              = 0
nstvout              = 0
nstfout              = 0
nstlog               = 1000
nstxtcout            = 0
nstenergy            = 5
energygrps           = Protein Non-Protein
nstcalcenergy        = 5
nstlist              = 10
ns-type              = Grid
pbc                  = xyz
rlist                = 0.9
coulombtype          = PME
rcoulomb             = 0.9
rvdw                 = 0.9
fourierspacing       = 0.12
pme_order            = 4
ewald_rtol           = 1e-5
gen_vel              = yes
gen_temp             = 200.0
gen_seed             = 9999
constraints          = all-bonds
tcoupl               = V-rescale
tc-grps              = Protein  Non-Protein
tau_t                = 0.1      0.1
ref_t                = 298      298
pcoupl               = no


Thank you for your help,
 Eva


>
>
> On 10/18/12 6:15 AM, reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de wrote:
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>> my .mdp file looks like this:
>>
>> define                  = -DPOSRES
>> integrator              = steep
>> emtol                   = 10
>> nsteps                  = 30000
>> nstenergy               = 1
>> energygrps              = System
>> coulombtype             = PME
>> rcoulomb                = 0.9
>> rvdw                    = 0.9
>> rlist                   = 0.9
>> fourierspacing          = 0.12
>> pme_order               = 4
>> ewald_rtol              = 1e-5
>> pbc                     = xyz
>>
>>
>> And yes, I use constraints. I have a membrane represented by dummy atoms
>> around my protein. They are fixed and I also fixed the backbone. Or is
>> that a problem.
>>
>
> The EM seems to have worked fine, so we need the .mdp file for NVT, not
> EM.
> Your membrane representation could be an issue, but I'm not clear on the
> terminology here.  A "dummy atom" (or virtual site) is a particle with
> nonbonded
> parameters but no mass.  Is that what you're dealing with?  If this
> membrane
> environment is fixed and the backbone is too, you may get clashes in the
> system,
> but it doesn't sound like there's a whole lot that's moving in the first
> place.
>   General troubleshooting advice (that I seem to post almost daily):
>
> http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up#Diagnosing_an_Unstable_System
>
> Your simulation is failing fairly early, so finding the source of the
> crash
> should not be terribly difficult.
>
> -Justin
>
>
>>> It could be due to your mdp-settings. What's your time step? Do you use
>>> constraints and virtual interaction sites?
>>>
>>> Erik
>>>
>>> 18 okt 2012 kl. 12.04 skrev
>>> reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de:
>>>
>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>> thank you for your answer.
>>>> So you think that a force of 3.2341940e+02 is okey? To work on?
>>>>
>>>> I also tried to work on with a NVT run but then I got many many LINCS
>>>> warnings:
>>>>
>>>> Step 1114, time 2.228 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
>>>> relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
>>>> rms 0.000169, max 0.001796 (between atoms 3480 and 3482)
>>>> bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
>>>> atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
>>>>    3480   3482   30.3    0.1090   0.1092      0.1090
>>>>
>>>> Step 1121, time 2.242 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
>>>> relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
>>>> rms 0.000108, max 0.000561 (between atoms 2000 and 2001)
>>>> bonds that rotated more than 30 degrees:
>>>> atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length
>>>>    2002   2005   30.4    0.1090   0.1090      0.1090
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And in the end there is the error:
>>>>
>>>> Fatal error:
>>>> 11 particles communicated to PME node 2 are more than 2/3 times the
>>>> cut-off out of the domain decomposit
>>>> ion cell of their charge group in dimension x.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I looked it up on the GROMACS site and it was written there that such
>>>> a
>>>> error is caused by a not well equilibrated system.
>>>>
>>>> So I thought that the high force might be the reason.
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Eva,
>>>>>
>>>>> The change in energy in every step became smaller than the machine
>>>>> precision can represent (as is stated in the output). In other words:
>>>>> your
>>>>> system is minimized to a very high degree.
>>>>> A value of 10 for the Fmax is very low for a system like yours, even
>>>>> with
>>>>> a pure protein in water system you probably wouldn't hit this value.
>>>>> Furthermore, 30.000 steps for a minimization seems pretty high to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Felix
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>>>>> Von: gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org
>>>>> [mailto:gmx-users-bounces at gromacs.org]
>>>>> Im Auftrag von reisingere at rostlab.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2012 10:56
>>>>> An: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>>> Betreff: [gmx-users] question about the minimization
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi everybody,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a question about the minimization of my protein. For this
>>>>> minimization I fixed the backbone and the membrane atoms which around
>>>>> my
>>>>> protein.
>>>>>
>>>>> I minimized it 30000 steps long but after step 20385 it stops with
>>>>> the
>>>>> output:
>>>>>
>>>>> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 20385 steps, but
>>>>> did
>>>>> not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
>>>>> Potential Energy  = -8.8805600e+05
>>>>> Maximum force     =  3.2341940e+02 on atom 3050
>>>>> Norm of force     =  2.0930219e+00
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not see why it can not reach a lower force.
>>>>>
>>>>> I already looked at the structure with Pymol and there I saw that the
>>>>> atom
>>>>> 3050 is in a loop and do not interact with any other residue.
>>>>>
>>>>> My .mdp file looks like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> define                  = -DPOSRES
>>>>> integrator              = steep
>>>>> emtol                   = 10
>>>>> nsteps                  = 30000
>>>>> nstenergy               = 1
>>>>> energygrps              = System
>>>>> coulombtype             = PME
>>>>> rcoulomb                = 0.9
>>>>> rvdw                    = 0.9
>>>>> rlist                   = 0.9
>>>>> fourierspacing          = 0.12
>>>>> pme_order               = 4
>>>>> ewald_rtol              = 1e-5
>>>>> pbc                     = xyz
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you see a reason why it can not reach a force lower than 10?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Eva
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>>> * Please search the archive at
>>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>>>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
>>>>> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>>> --
>>>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>>> * Please search the archive at
>>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>>>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>>> * Please search the archive at
>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>> Erik Marklund, PhD
>>> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
>>> Husargatan 3, Box 596,    75124 Uppsala, Sweden
>>> phone:    +46 18 471 6688        fax: +46 18 511 755
>>> erikm at xray.bmc.uu.se
>>> http://www2.icm.uu.se/molbio/elflab/index.html
>>>
>>> --
>>> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
>>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>>> * Please search the archive at
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> ========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Research Scientist
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> ========================================
> --
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>





More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list