[gmx-users] Re: Re: help: load imbalance (Justin Lemkul)
申昊
shenhao at mail.bnu.edu.cn
Thu Apr 11 07:12:20 CEST 2013
> > Hello,
> > I wanna ask some questions about load imbalance.
> > 1> Here are the messages resulted from grompp -f md.mdp -p topol.top -c
> > npt.gro -o md.tpr
> >
> > NOTE 1 [file md.mdp]:
> > The optimal PME mesh load for parallel simulations is below 0.5
> > and for highly parallel simulations between 0.25 and 0.33,
> > for higher performance, increase the cut-off and the PME grid spacing
> >
> > therefore, i changed the md.mdp as whrited below, then used the command
> > grompp -f md.mdp -p topol.top -c npt.gro -o md.tpr , then there is no NOTE
> > printed. So if i change the cut-offs to 2.0 nm and increase the grid
> > spacing to 0.30, does the calculated results reasonable?
> >
> >
> No. You're making ad hoc changes to nonbonded cutoffs (which can completely
> invalidate the force field model) and you're making the PME grid less
> accurate.
>
> -Justin
>
Thank you for the kind reply. So now how to make the simulated system balanced via some commands without changing the mdp file?
Best wishes!
Hao
>
> > ; Neighborsearching
> > ns_type = grid ; search neighboring grid cells
> > nstlist = 5 ; 10 fs
> > rlist = 2 ; short-range neighborlist cutoff (in nm)
> > rcoulomb = 2 ; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm)
> > rvdw = 2 ; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm)
> > ; Electrostatics
> > coulombtype = PME ; Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range
> > electrostatics
> > pme_order = 4 ; cubic interpolation
> > fourierspacing = 0.3 ; grid spacing for FFT
> >
> > 2> and how about no changes, just simulate it with the original mdp. Is
> > the results still reasonable? Here are the messages without any changes:
> >
> > DD load balancing is limited by minimum cell size in dimension X
> > DD step 2933999 vol min/aver 0.189! load imb.: force 124.7%
> >
> > Step Time Lambda
> > 2934000 5868.00000 0.00000
> >
> > Energies (kJ/mol)
> > Angle Proper Dih. Ryckaert-Bell. LJ-14 Coulomb-14
> > 2.99315e+02 2.13778e+01 1.74659e+02 2.22024e+02 2.02466e+03
> > LJ (SR) Disper. corr. Coulomb (SR) Coul. recip. Potential
> > -1.68074e+02 -2.09809e-01 -1.80294e+03 -3.28155e+03 -2.51074e+03
> > Kinetic En. Total Energy Temperature Pres. DC (bar) Pressure (bar)
> > 1.69264e+04 1.44156e+04 2.95552e+02 -1.33866e-04 1.51489e+00
> > Constr. rmsd
> > 2.60082e-05
> >
> >
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list