Aw: [gmx-users] Order of atoms in topology
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon Apr 29 23:34:27 CEST 2013
Please start a new thread if you're going to introduce a new topic. I have
changed the subject to something more relevant.
On 4/29/13 4:23 PM, lloyd riggs wrote:
> *Dear All,*
> *Doing a water/temp energy minimization just for a figure with a large molecule
> that has several connected parts, I ran into a bizzar question.*
> *So I found its possible by accident to define improper dihedrails forwards and
> backwards without gromacs complaining, such as atom 1 2 3 4 and 4 3 2 1. My
> question is, if your topology has this, does it affect the calculations (angle
> energy or other)?*
Yes, it does. For impropers, the order matters. In the two examples, you are
specifying different properties. With "1 2 3 4," you are saying that atom 1 is
planar and atoms 2, 3, and 4 are the atoms around it that govern its planarity.
With "4 3 2 1," you are saying atom 4 is the planar center, with atoms 1, 2,
and 3 similarly governing its planarity.
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Department of Biochemistry
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users