[gmx-users] NPT-REMD
Michael Shirts
mrshirts at gmail.com
Sun Aug 25 23:38:19 CEST 2013
Pressure should fluctuate significantly. The estimator for the
pressure that is generally used is very noisy. The question is, do the
pressure averages over, say, 500 ps or 1 ns look about right?
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 6:22 PM, rahul seth
> <rahul.seth.gromacs at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have been trying to perform NPT-REMD with a Protein Substrate and water.
>> I am trying to use md+nose-hoover thermostat and parrinello-rahman
>> barostat. However, I am not quite sure about the tau-t and the tau-p that I
>> should be using here. I paste a part of my mdp file below:
>> define = -DPOSRES_subs
>> constraints = all-bonds
>> pbc = xyz
>> integrator = md
>> ;ld_seed = %8i
>> dt = 0.002 ; ps !
>> nsteps = 250000 ; 50 ns
>> ;
>> nstcomm = 1
>> nstcalcenergy = 10
>> nstxout = 0
>> nstxtcout = 5000 ;every 10 ps
>> nstvout = 0
>> nstfout = 0
>> nstlog = 1000
>> nstenergy = 1000
>> nstlist = 10
>> ns_type = grid
>> rlist = 1.0
>> vdwtype = cut-off
>> rvdw = 1.0
>> coulombtype = pme
>> rcoulomb = 1.0
>> fourierspacing = 0.12
>> pme_order = 4
>> ewald_rtol = 1e-5
>> optimize_fft = yes
>> tcoupl = nose-hoover
>> nsttcouple = 5
>> tc-grps = subs Protein SOL
>> tau_t = 0.2 0.2 0.2
>> ref_t = %8.3f %8.3f %8.3f
>> ; Energy monitoring
>> energygrps = subs Protein SOL
>> ; Isotropic pressure coupling is now on
>> Pcoupl = parrinello-rahman
>> nstpcouple = 1
>> refcoord-scaling = all
>> Pcoupltype = isotropic
>> tau_p = 2.0
>> compressibility = 4.5e-5
>> ref_p = 1.01325
>>
>>
>> Although the temperatures in this case stays close to the desired values,
>> the pressures of the individual replicas fluctuate significantly and hence
>> I do not think I have weird replica exchange probabilities.
>
> Seemingly large
> http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Pressure fluctuations
> are normal - see link. You should satisfy yourself that your .mdp file
> produces ensembles that are respectable before you get involved with
> REMD, and gathering statistics for that will take longer for pressure
> than temperature.
>
>> I have varied tau-t and tau-p from 0.2 to 1 and 1 to 5 respectively. It
>> doesn't really seem to improve anything. Can anyone suggest a set of
>> optimized values for these parameters? I understand these maybe context
>> dependent but to give you a rough idea I have about ~18,000 atoms with 170
>> for atoms 1156 for substrate and the rest for water.
>
> Your literature survey of similar simulations should give you an idea
> of usage in the field, but (e.g. per GROMACS manual thermostat
> section) I would think tau-t for N-H should not go below 1. Otherwise,
> first observe whether you have a real problem before making haphazard
> changes :-)
>
> Mark
>
>> --
>> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
>> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
>> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
>> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list