[gmx-users] Fwd: using nopbc is not equal to using pbc with big box dimensions
Dr. Vitaly Chaban
vvchaban at gmail.com
Tue Dec 3 09:29:06 CET 2013
So, remove PME in the large box case and everything must be nice.
Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Golshan Hejazi <golshan.hejazi at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply. The result is surprisingly different:
>
> with nopbc Potential energy= -2.53730634908684e+05
> with large box Potential energy= -2.21066633251456e+05
>
> I have tried with very large boxes too! but results are not even similar.
> This is what I am using as input in mdp file:
> pbc = no
> nstlist = 0
> epsilon_r = 1.
> ns_type = Simple
> coulombtype = Cut-off
> vdwtype = Cut-off
> fourierspacing = 0.12
> ; EWALD/PME/PPPM parameters
> pme_order = 4
> ewald_rtol = 1e-05
> epsilon_surface = 0
> optimize_fft = yes
> rlist = 0.
> rcoulomb = 0.
> rvdw = 0.
> emtol = 1.0
>
> And this is for when I use the large box:
> pbc = xyz
> nstlist = 10
> epsilon_r = 1.
> ns_type = grid
> coulombtype = pme
> vdwtype = Cut-off
> fourierspacing = 0.12
> ; EWALD/PME/PPPM parameters
> pme_order = 4
> ewald_rtol = 1e-05
> epsilon_surface = 0
> optimize_fft = yes
> rlist = 0.7
> rcoulomb = 0.7
> rvdw = 0.7
> emtol = 1.0
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 2, 2013 7:45 PM, Dr. Vitaly Chaban <vvchaban at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> The fact that images are separated by a distance exceeding the cutoff,
> does not mean that they do not interact electrostatically.
>
> I hope the results are not much different...
>
>
> Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
>
>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Golshan Hejazi
>> <golshan.hejazi at yahoo.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like to compute the energy of a system in vacuum. For this I
>>> first
>>> computed energy by using nopbc and putting rculomb=rvdw=0 ...
>>> Then I computed the energy using pbc with a big box dimension (periodic
>>> images are separated by a length more than cutoff )... this means that
>>> periodic images dont interact ... results are different ... but which one
>>> is correct?
>>>
>>>
>>> Can you help me to understand this better
>>> G.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a
> mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list