[gmx-users] Pressure coupling constants
mrshirts at gmail.com
Thu Dec 12 18:35:17 CET 2013
If the goal is to get the system to relax from a compressed state as
part of preparation, then berendsen pressure coupling is the best way.
However, it is not a physical method -- it overly constraints the
volume distribution (which is one of the reasons it's good to force a
system into a reasonable state).
shorter tau_p and also short tau_t will help the relaxation occur
without the simulation blowing up.
If you want to get any meaningful physics at equilibration, then use
MTTK or Parrinello-Rahman.
None of the barostats are physically meaningful for nonequilibrium
expansion or compression.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:11 PM, kpsanto <santo.kp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
> I am using NPT ensemble to relax a highly compressed system. I find that
> the way it relaxes depends on the pressure coupling constant ( berendsen
> barostat). My question is if the choice of the coupling constant would
> depend on the system conditions? The compressed system would tend to at
> expand faster rate and accordingly one should use a coupling constant much
> smaller than usual?
> K. P. Santo
> Post doctoral fellow
> Department of Chemistry
> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> Chapel Hill, NC, USA
> View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Pressure-coupling-constants-tp5013292.html
> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users