[gmx-users] Implicit solvation: nonpolar term?
robert.darkins.11 at ucl.ac.uk
Fri Dec 20 00:15:01 CET 2013
Thanks for the reply Justin but I'm confused. Why must the atoms be bonded?
Ultimately I plan to model micellisation whereby surfactants, which only
interact with each other via non-bonded terms, are driven to aggregate by
this nonpolar term...
View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Implicit-solvation-nonpolar-term-tp5013432p5013434.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users