[gmx-users] Re: clarification regarding contact map - g_mdmat
Kavyashree M
hmkvsri at gmail.com
Fri Feb 1 10:01:06 CET 2013
Dear users,
Sorry. It is because the unit of the cutoff distance ]is in nm.
Thank you
kavya
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Kavyashree M <hmkvsri at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear users,
> I used g_mdmap to calculate the C-alpha contact map of
> the trajectory. the distance cut off of 8.0 Ang was selected
> The protein is a dimer of 237 residues. The output of -no was
> like this -
> #res ratio tot mean natm mean/atm
> 1 1.000 473 473.000 1 473.000
> 2 1.000 473 473.000 1 473.000
> 3 1.000 473 473.000 1 473.000
> 4 1.000 473 473.000 1 473.000
> 5 1.000 473 473.000 1 473.000
> 6 1.000 473 473.000 1 473.000
> 7 1.000 473 473.000 1 473.000
> ....
> So it mean that on an average each calpha atom contacts all
> other C-alpha atom in the whole trajectory at some point of time.
>
> In order to cross check it I collected data only for one time frame.
> This was also very similar results. all the residues have a minimum
> of atleast 471 contacts.
>
> Some one kindly clarify where I am going wrong.? the command
> I used was -
> g_mdmat -f .*.xtc -s *.tpr -no *.xvg -mean *.xpm -b 4000 -e 4000 -t 8.0
>
> Is this trucating distance in Angstroms or nanometer?
>
> Thank you
> Kavya
>
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list