[gmx-users] Re: Simulation of 2D lattice model
jalemkul at vt.edu
Sat Jan 5 19:18:33 CET 2013
On 1/5/13 1:45 AM, James Starlight wrote:
> Justin, thanks for explanation again!
> So if I understood correctly in the ffnonbonded c6 correspond to the
> attraction term and c12 to the repulsion term doestn't it ? So might
> the vdw radius of the atom be increased/ deacreased via corrections in
> the c6 term ?
> mass charge ptype V(c6) W(c12)
> O 8 15.99940 0.000 A 0.22617E-02 0.74158E-06
Both C6 and C12 are calculated from both epsilon and sigma, so it's not clear to
me that simply tweaking C6 alone would somehow be considered changing the van
der Waals radius.
> by the way I've found that in all gromos ff both C6 term given in the
> inapropriate form
> C 6 0.000 0.000 A 0.0023406244 4.937284e-06
> so it may complicate such correction in that ff.
What's wrong with it?
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Department of Biochemistry
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users