[gmx-users] Fatal error: Number of atoms in Topology is not the same as in Trajectory
Shima Arasteh
shima_arasteh2001 at yahoo.com
Wed Jan 30 12:01:44 CET 2013
Dear users,
I' d like to know if I need to check the npt.gro file time by time? I mean is it possible for npt.gro file to reach the equilibrated state and then again become unequilibrated?
Thanks for your suggestions.
Sincerely,
Shima
________________________________
From: Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error: Number of atoms in Topology is not the same as in Trajectory
http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Terminology/Blowing_Up contains the
ideas that will likely help you, e.g. smaller time step, more
equilibration-friendly pressure coupling.
Mark
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Shima Arasteh
<shima_arasteh2001 at yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>
> It is 15 ns of NPT equilibration and I have not got a proper npt output
> yet to go to the MDrun. Because when I run the -mdrun command, I get fatal
> error as water molecule can not be settled.
>
> I guess that the system might need more equilibration.
>
> These are the settings of my npt.mdp file. The force field which I use is
> C36.
>
> integrator = md ; leap-frog integrator
> nsteps =250000 ; 2 * 250000 = 500 ps
> dt = 0.002 ; 2 fs
> ; Output control
> nstxout = 1000 ; save coordinates every 0.2 ps
> nstvout = 1000 ; save velocities every 0.2 ps
> nstenergy = 1000 ; save energies every 0.2 ps
> nstlog = 1000 ; update log file every 0.2 ps
>
> continuation = yes ; first dynamics run
> constraint_algorithm = lincs ; holonomic constraints
> constraints = h-bonds ; all bonds (even heavy atom-H bonds)
> constrained
> lincs_iter = 1 ; accuracy of LINCS
> lincs_order = 4 ; also related to accuracy
> ; Neighborsearching
> ns_type = grid ; search neighboring grid cells
> nstlist = 5 ; 10 fs
> rlist = 1.2 ; short-range neighborlist cutoff (in nm)
> rlistlong = 1.4
> rcoulomb = 1.2 ; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm)
> rvdw = 1.2 ; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm)
> vdwtype = switch
> rvdw_switch = 0.8
> ; Electrostatics
> coulombtype = PME ; Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range
> electrostatics
> pme_order = 4 ; cubic interpolation
> fourierspacing = 0.16 ; grid spacing for FFT
> ; Temperature coupling is on
> tcoupl = Nose-Hoover ; modified Berendsen thermostat
> tc-grps = Protein POPC SOL_CL ; two coupling groups - more
> accurate
> tau_t = 0.5 0.5 0.5 ; time constant, in ps
> ref_t = 310 310 310 ; reference temperature, one for each
> group, in K
> pcoupl = Parrinello-Rahman ; no pressure coupling in
> NVT
> pcoupltype = semiisotropic
> tau_p = 4
> ref_p = 1.01325 1.01325
> compressibility = 4.5e-5 4.5e-5
>
> ; Periodic boundary conditions
> pbc = xyz ; 3-D PBC
> ; Dispersion correction
> DispCorr = no ; account for cut-off vdW scheme
> ; Velocity generation
> gen_vel = no ; assign velocities from Maxwell
> distribution
> ;gen_temp = 310 ; temperature for Maxwell distribution
> ;gen_seed = -1 ; generate a random seed
> nstcomm = 1
> comm_mode = Linear
> comm_grps = Protein_POPC SOL_CL
>
> Would you please give me any sugestions? What are the possible problems
> might be considered?
>
>
> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> Sincerely,
> Shima
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users at gromacs.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 6, 2013 9:15 AM
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Fatal error: Number of atoms in Topology is not
> the same as in Trajectory
>
>
>
> On 1/6/13 12:33 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote:
> > Do you mean that I re-run NPT step with the new index file and npt.gro
> (which I got from the last NPT equilibration)? That's not clear to me yet.
> >
>
> That's where I'd start. You may have to run the new configuration through
> the entire equilibration protocol, though. Instability during MD often
> indicates inadequate equilibration, so whatever your protocol is may not be
> sufficient as is and may require greater time.
>
> -Justin
>
> -- ========================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Research Scientist
> Department of Biochemistry
> Virginia Tech
> Blacksburg, VA
> jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
> http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin
>
> ========================================
> -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
--
gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list