[gmx-users] defining impropers necessary?
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Jul 17 20:16:19 CEST 2013
On 7/17/13 2:15 PM, gromacs query wrote:
>>> what you mean here about the improper being defined "about bonds."
> Sorry I meant peptide bond itself
>>> That's all there is to it.
> Does that mean Yes and I understood it correctly or something else? sorry
> about that!
Yes, what you posted is correct.
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users