[gmx-users] defining impropers necessary?

Justin Lemkul jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Jul 17 20:16:19 CEST 2013

On 7/17/13 2:15 PM, gromacs query wrote:
>>> what you mean here about the improper being defined "about bonds."
> Sorry I meant peptide bond itself
>>> That's all there is to it.
> Does that mean Yes and I understood it correctly or something else? sorry
> about that!

Yes, what you posted is correct.



Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list