[gmx-users] constant protonation state MD
shahid nayeem
msnayeem at gmail.com
Fri May 3 14:05:30 CEST 2013
Thanks a lot Erik. Could I get some reference based on which you say that
much of the structural biology will be largely unaffected.
Shahid
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Erik Marklund <erikm at xray.bmc.uu.se> wrote:
> There's no general answer to that. Proton conductivity measurements, for
> instance, will be horribly wrong without dynamic protonation. Much (but not
> all) structural biology, however, will be largely unaffected.
>
> Erik
>
> On 3 May 2013, at 04:30, shahid nayeem <msnayeem at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear all
> >
> > Can someone enlighten me on the reliability of the results obtained from
> > constant protonation state (assigned by different pKa value at different
> > pH) MD simulation. Also want to know its reliability in case of implicit
> > solvation model such as PB/GB calculation.
> >
> > Shahid
> > --
> > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> > * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> > * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> > www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list