[gmx-users] Re: REMD analysis

[XAvier Periole]

What do you not like in your distributions? What are your looking for in these distributions? 

I am not sure what you are expecting from the list here … your distributions are fine, but, as Mark noted, it does not mean your simulation and sampling will be optimal … 

On May 17, 2013, at 3:51 PM, bharat gupta <bharat.85.monu at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Sir,
> 
> I tried plotting the PE overlap using the following way :-
> 
> 1. extract PE of each replica using g_energy
> 2. get the PE distribution using g_analyze -f potential_0.xvg -dist pot0.xvg
> 3. used xmgrace to plot all the PE distribution graphs together.
> 
> The same thing I did for temperature distribution for each replica.
> 
> Here's the file for both PE overlap (
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/895f1bi0hkuy884/pe_dist.png)
> temp distribution (https://www.dropbox.com/s/ed66uop16blgqwa/temp_dist.png)
> Is this the correct way ??
> 
> 
> But the plot doesnot look like this (
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/fsuabkl7zrydnib/sample%20PE%20overlap.jpg). Do i
> have to normalize the data and then plot in order to get a smooth plot like
> this one??
> 
> --------
> Bharat
> -- 
> gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists