[gmx-users] Re: REMD analysis
Mark Abraham
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Thu May 23 08:42:40 CEST 2013
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 2:19 AM, bharat gupta <bharat.85.monu at gmail.com>wrote:
> Dear Sir,
>
> I performed another round of trial with different set of temperature and I
> got the avg accp. ration around 0.22. Here's the temp. dist. that I used :
> 250 268 288 308 331 355 380 408 438 469 503 540 579 621
>
> I then checked the replica_index and replica_temp files for each replica
> individually. The plots are exactly similar for all the replicas, as an eg.
> here's the link for first three replicas .
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/cuydj010wh2hgkt/replica_index0.png
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/q01wluh8wxlcxs8/replica_index1.png
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/cm9f8qo1afo6w4k/replica_index2.png
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/gkbu0g0e1r37l57/replica_temp0.png
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/sffq8rwghjublu0/replica_temp1.png
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/ulccw8xabj66ktm/replica_temp2.png
>
>
These are the same data. Whatever you are doing to generate them isn't what
you think you're doing :-)
Mark
> I checked the PE overlap also, that looks fine (
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/0qf06of9lp1m51d/pe_overlap.png)
> I checked for the temp. dist. which also looks fine to me .
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/ed66uop16blgqwa/temp_dist.png
>
> I don't know why all plots are similar ?? Is this related to wrong settings
> in mdp file. Here's the mdp file that I am using for production run. I
> changed ref_t for each replica in the mdp file.
>
>
> I suspect that I am doing something wrong somewhere ...
>
> define = -DPOSRESHELIX ; -DFLEXIBLE -DPOSRES
> constraints = all-bonds
> integrator = md
> dt = 0.002 ; ps
> nsteps = 25000000; 50000 ps = 50 ns
> nstcomm = 10
> nstcalcenergy = 10
> nstxout = 1000 ; frequency to write coordinates to output
> trajectory
> nstvout = 0 ; frequency to write velocities to output
> trajectory; the last velocities are always written
> nstfout = 0 ; frequency to write forces to output
> trajectory
> nstlog = 1000 ; frequency to write energies to log
> file
> nstenergy = 1000 ; frequency to write energies to edr file
>
> vdwtype = cut-off
> coulombtype = cut-off
>
> pbc = no
>
> nstlist = 0
> ns_type = simple
> rlist = 0 ; this means all-vs-all (no cut-off), which
> gets expensive for bigger systems
> rcoulomb = 0
> rvdw = 0
>
> comm-mode = angular
> comm-grps = system
>
> optimize_fft = yes
>
> ; V-rescale temperature coupling is on
> Tcoupl = v-rescale
> tau_t = 0.1
> tc_grps = system
> ref_t = 250
> ; Pressure coupling is off
> Pcoupl = no
> ; Generate velocites is on
> gen_vel = yes
> gen_temp = 300
> gen_seed = -1
>
> ;
> ; Implicit solvent
> ;
> implicit_solvent = GBSA
> gb_algorithm = Still ; HCT ; OBC
> nstgbradii = 1
> rgbradii = 0 ; [nm] Cut-off for the calculation of the
> Born radii. Currently must be equal to rlist
> gb_epsilon_solvent = 78.5 ; Dielectric constant for the implicit
> solvent
> ; gb_saltconc = 0 ; Salt concentration for implicit
> solvent models, currently not used
> sa_algorithm = Ace-approximation
> sa_surface_tension = 0.005
>
>
> It will be helpful if you provide your comments...
>
> Regards
> --------------
> BHARAT
> --
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list