[gmx-users] Re: gmx-users Digest, Vol 114, Issue 91
Knapp Bernhard
bernhard.knapp at meduniwien.ac.at
Thu Oct 31 10:55:23 CET 2013
> On 10/30/13 11:26 AM, Knapp Bernhard wrote:
>> Hi users,
>>
>> I was wondering if there is an easy and quick way to get a frame-wise
>> binding
>> energy between 2 groups of chains (chain ABC vs DE) in an existing
>> trajectory.
>> This is not indented to be an actual binding free energy approach but
>> rather a
>> rough indicator if the binding between two chains increases or
>> decreases during
>> simulation time. This should work like a protein/protein docking
>> scoring
>> function which assigns binding scores to single conformations. Is
>> there a direct
>> approach on an existing xtc (even if water was removed and not all
>> steps were
>> written)? Maybe like g_hbond but in addition with terms like Gvdw,
>> Gdeformation,
>> Ghydrophobic etc. Alternatively (and probably much more time and
>> resource
>> consuming), would it be possible to obtain this by the rerun option of
>> mdrun
>> (adjusted energy monitoring groups (the original setup was "energygrps
>> =
>> protein SOL"))?
>>
>
> Using energygrps is the closest you'll get without modifying the code.
> You'll
> get decomposed short-range nonbonded terms, which can perhaps provide
> some
> indicator of the strength of the interaction between the two entities.
>
> -Justin
>
Hmm ok if Gromacs does not provide something like this then I ask the
question a little bit different: Does someone know a pure scoring
function for protein/protein interaction? It should not be a complete
docking program but rather something which can simply evaluate given
conformations (coming from an MD trajectory) ... and it should also not
be a webserver (like ClusPro) but a downloadable binary because I want
to test a quite high amount of conformations. Something like XSCORE [J
Comp Aid Des, 16: 11-26. 2002] but instead of ligand/protein for
protein/protein interactions.
Cheers,
Bernhard
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list