[gmx-users] Re: periodic molecule
Valentina
valentina.erastova at durham.ac.uk
Wed Sep 18 14:34:09 CEST 2013
Justin Lemkul wrote
> On 9/18/13 8:07 AM, Valentina wrote:
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Yep, they seem to be wanting to bond to the O's within the cell, while
>> they
>> are meant to bond across the PBC.
>>
>> I am not sure how periodic_molecule = yes part functions. I don't seem to
>> get difference if I turn it on or off when I do Energy minimisation. Do
>> you
>> have some examples that work, so I can compare to them? Are there some
>
> I have never used periodic molecules, except when toying around with some
> CNTs
> for my own curiosity. I suspect the problem you're seeing arises from the
> bonded atoms being closer within the unit cell than they are across PBC,
> so the
> minimum distance is what is trying to be satisfied.
>
>
>
> Nope, thats not the case.
> Across pbc it's 2.06A while across the cell it's 7.89A (see the attached
> pic, where in bold are the atoms whitin the cell and small are the
> periodic representation it should bond to)
<http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/file/n5011279/Screen_Shot_2013-09-18_at_13.30.23.png>
>
> How far apart are the atoms
> across PBC, and how long is the assigned bond supposed to be? I have seen
> other
> cases posted to the list wherein the periodic_molecules function breaks
> down
> simply because of bad starting geometry.
>
>
>> threshold distances, that they rely upon? I really wouldn't like to have
>> to
>> make the a bigger basic cell - too much topology assigning.
>>
>
> A bigger unit cell won't help. In fact, it would probably make things
> worse.
>
> Agree, thank you!
>
> -Justin
>
> --
> ==================================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Postdoctoral Fellow
>
> Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
> School of Pharmacy
> Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
> University of Maryland, Baltimore
> 20 Penn St.
> Baltimore, MD 21201
> jalemkul at .umaryland
> | (410) 706-7441
>
> ==================================================
> --
> gmx-users mailing list
> gmx-users@
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to
> gmx-users-request@
> .
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
--
View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/periodic-molecule-tp5011270p5011279.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list