[gmx-users] Re: Minimum distance periodic images, protein simulation
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Sat Sep 21 14:12:17 CEST 2013
You can try a run in implicit solvent to get a feel for the maximum
diameter of the protein while unfolding. You will not have any
certainty unless you can afford a box whose diameter is that of the
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:03 PM, aksharma <arunsharma_cnu at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> Thanks for your reply. I have some follow-up questions. Since the simulation
> is high temperature (450 K) there is slight unfolding of the protein.
> The box was set up as rhombic dodecahedron with 1.2 nm as the distance
> between solute and edge of box.
> pdb2gmx -f 1L2Y.pdb -o 1L2Y-processed.gro -ignh -water spce
> The cutoffs are 0.9 nm for VDW and electrostatics.
> Do you suggest using an even bigger box for studying unfolding? Or is there
> something else that could be going on? Do you have any ball park suggestions
> for a good size of the box or is this something that I would have to
> experiment with different sizes until I land a suitable box.
> Thanks a lot,
> View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/Minimum-distance-periodic-images-protein-simulation-tp5011343p5011347.html
> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> gmx-users mailing list gmx-users at gromacs.org
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
> * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users