[gmx-users] Regarding Null free energy values in Free energy perturbation (bond force constant perturbation)
bipin singh
bipinelmat at gmail.com
Mon Dec 22 16:05:42 CET 2014
Hi all,
I am trying to perform a free energy perturbation calculation (using
Gromacs 4.6.3) to perturb the force constant of a bond (in vaccum), using
the B-state parameters in the topology as follows:
[ bonds ]
; ai aj funct c0 c1 c0B c1B
3 4 2 0.1090 1.2300e+07 0.1090 6.1500e+08
I have used 20 intermediate states between lambda=0 and 1. The MDP setting
(only some part shown) used for the calculation are as follows:
cutoff-scheme = group
coulombtype = cut-off
rcoulomb = 0.0
vdw-type = cut-off
rvdw = 0.0
pbc = no
nstlist = 0
ns-type = simple
free-energy = yes
couple-moltype = LIG
sc-power = 1
sc-alpha = 0.0
sc-r-power = 6
sc-sigma = 0.3
sc-coul = no
couple-intramol = yes
couple-lambda1 = vdw-q ; Do not change the non-bonded int. during
FEP
couple-lambda0 = vdw-q
init-lambda = 0.0 (set accordingly for other intermediates)
delta-lambda = 0
foreign-lambda = 0.05 (set accordingly for other intermediates)
nstdhdl = 10
dhdl-print-energy = no
But the final DG values with g_bar gives null values as shown below:
Final results in kJ/mol:
point 0.000 - 0.050, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.050 - 0.100, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.100 - 0.150, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.150 - 0.200, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.200 - 0.250, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.250 - 0.300, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.300 - 0.350, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.350 - 0.400, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.400 - 0.450, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.450 - 0.500, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.500 - 0.550, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.550 - 0.600, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.600 - 0.650, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.650 - 0.700, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.700 - 0.750, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.750 - 0.800, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.800 - 0.850, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.850 - 0.900, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.900 - 0.950, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
point 0.950 - 1.000, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
total 0.000 - 1.000, DG 0.00 +/- 0.00
Please let me know, what could be the reason for this behavior.
*-------------------Thanks and Regards,Bipin Singh*
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list