[gmx-users] User-defined Potentials in Gromacs

[Francis Jing]

Why "tabulated function" cannot resolve your question? It can do anything
as long as the interaction is two-body and distance-dependent.

Francis


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:03 PM, cchan2242-c
<cchan2242-c at my.cityu.edu.hk>wrote:

> Hello everyone here!
> Currently I want to define a user-defined potentials for the purpose of
> doing molecular dynamics by interaction between certain atoms only.
> So I'm giving up the all-atom simulation and so the previously defined
> potentials in Gromacs which comprehensively includes interaction between
> all
> atoms.
> I have looked up "tabulated potential" in the manual and also the suggested
> document, neither of them actually helps the situation.
> As I am trying to use potentials from another paper which is much more
> complicated than the form of l-j potentials.
> Is there any way that I can redefined the form of the potentials? Or I have
> to turn my potentials into the form of l-j potentials introduced in the
> documents then input my own parameters?
>
> Anyone had experience with this is greatly appreciated.
>
>
> Kevin
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/User-defined-Potentials-in-Gromacs-tp5014810.html
> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>



-- 
Zhifeng (Francis) Jing
Graduate Student in Physical Chemistry
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
Shanghai Jiao Tong University
http://sun.sjtu.edu.cn