[gmx-users] difference in potenital energy on desktop and server run
Dr. Vitaly Chaban
vvchaban at gmail.com
Thu Feb 27 09:05:06 CET 2014
Strange.
Sometimes things like this may happen if you incorrectly treat
periodicity between runs.
Without having the system at hand, I cannot say more.
Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:16 AM, gupta.rakesh082
<gupta.rakesh082 at gmail.com> wrote:
> EM RUN
>
> Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 2820 steps,
> but did not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
> Potential Energy = -2.9268122e+05
> Maximum force = 1.9479546e+02 on atom 123
> Norm of force = 6.3931437e+00
>
> grompp -f em.mdp -c cerblayer.gro -p cer.itp -o min.tpr
> mdrun -c -v -deffnm min
>
> g_energy -f min.edr -o npt_potenital.xvg
> 10 0
>
> Statistics over 2818 steps [ 0.0000 through 2817.0000 ps ], 1 data sets
> All statistics are over 2225 points (frames)
>
> Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Potential -287434 2800 6986.15 -18110.5
> (kJ/mol)
>
>
>
> NPT RUN
>
> grompp -f NPT.mdp -c min.gro -p cer.itp -o NPT.tpr
> mdrun -nt 8 -c -v -deffnm NPT
>
> g_energy -f NPT.edr -o npt_potenital.xvg
> 10 0
>
> Statistics over 10000001 steps [ 0.0000 through 20000.0000 ps ], 1 data sets
> All statistics are over 100001 points
>
> Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Potential 168770 1300 31030.1 -6644.57
> (kJ/mol)
>
> I am surprised to see that at such huge potential energy my simulation box
> is still stable.
>
> Desktop Run
>
> I took generated NPT.gro file in previous run and performed a small 200 ps
> npt simulation on my desktop machine using following commmand.
>
> grompp -f NPT.mdp -c NPT.gro -p cer.itp -o NPTdesktop.tpr
> mdrun --c -v -deffnm NPTdesktop
>
> g_energy -f NPTdesktop.edr -o NPTdesktop_potential.xvg
>
> Statistics over 100001 steps [ 0.0000 through 200.0000 ps ], 1 data sets
> All statistics are over 1001 points
>
> Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Potential -234831 47 582.555 117.566
> (kJ/mol)
>
> This time potential energy became negative after few ps and converse to
> value around order of ~ -2x 10^5.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/difference-in-potenital-energy-on-desktop-and-server-run-tp5014813p5014834.html
> Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list