[gmx-users] peculiar water behavior

Tue Jun 17 16:32:10 CEST 2014

Any ideas :

1. why slab is moving despite of position constraints?

2. That too, only with "com" option of refcoord scaling...with "all" option
slab does not move...

Thanks

On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Chetan Mahajan <chetanvm10 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> The pics should be seen in the reverse order. Due to sorting by name,
> "After equilibration" pic occurs first.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Chetan Mahajan <chetanvm10 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> No, same things do not happen when it's a NVT simulation or no mixed
>> potentials. Also, with mixed potentials in NPT simulation, this things of
>> slab moving in one direction (thus following water movement) happens only
>> with -com option of refcoord-scaling, *not with -all option for
>> refcoord-scaling. *
>>
>> I have a crystal slab with equal amount of water on both the sides.
>> During NPT equilibration (with refcoord-scaling option of -com, not -all),
>> some water on side side of the slab enters opposite side due to periodic
>> boundary conditions I have (say water on the right side of the slab,
>> crosses boundary of the box and enter the left side of the slab due to
>> periodic boundaries. Even crystal slab follows this water and move same
>> distance in the same direction of water movement. Following link shares
>> pictures of the solvated slab before and after equilibration:
>>
>>
>> https://www.dropbox.com/sh/tjq80jgnff1y7ur/AAAzhnv8uwl-UMQ0TYx8PuPAa
>>
>> I feel, this is not an error, but it is odd. Due to periodicity we have,
>> output of any calculations will remain the same.  Again, with -all option
>> for refcoord scaling, this movement of water and slab DOES NOT occur.
>>
>> Thanks a lot!
>> regards
>> Chetan
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Repeating myself - simplify things! Do sane things happen with NVT? With
>>> no
>>> mixed potentials?
>>>
>>> Your words aren't making sense to me - you'll do much better with
>>> pictures,
>>> making sure you turn on your visualizer's option to show the periodic
>>> box.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Chetan Mahajan <chetanvm10 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Justin,
>>> >
>>> > I, actually, do not want to preserve any voids. Initial void that I
>>> > mentioned is supposed to be filled by water during equilibration and it
>>> > does so. However, problem is that some or major quantity of water
>>> moves out
>>> > from one side of the box to enter from the opposite side (obeying
>>> periodic
>>> > boundary conditions) and crystal slab moving following water movement.
>>> Thus
>>> > although initially there is almost equal amount of water on both sides
>>> of
>>> > the slab, we have more water on one side of the slab than the other
>>> side
>>> > after equilibration. In other words, length of the box on one side of
>>> the
>>> > slab is more than the other side after equilibration, although it is
>>> same
>>> > on both sides before equilibration. My dilemma is whether this is due
>>> to
>>> > pressure coupling or any gromacs thing or due to potentials (mixed
>>> > buckingham and LJ)?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Chetan
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 7:43 AM, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On 6/12/14, 11:15 PM, Chetan Mahajan wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> Dear All,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I am simulating TiO2 crystal solvated by water  and ions like
>>> sodium and
>>> > >> formate. I am observing one peculiar thing, and I would like to
>>> rectify
>>> > >> that. I have initial structure of crystal slab at the center of the
>>> box
>>> > >> elongated in z-direction and almost equal boxlength on both the
>>> sides,
>>> > >> with
>>> > >> a gap of 1 nm between slab surface and first layer of water close to
>>> > slab.
>>> > >>   This space is kept to avoid water going on the sides of the
>>> crystal
>>> > >> during
>>> > >> equilibration. This was a minor information. Now, the main
>>> observation
>>> > is
>>> > >> that during NPT equilibration, water from one side of the slab
>>> enters
>>> > the
>>> > >> other opposite side of the slab (using periodic conditions) so that
>>> > >> boxlengths on both sides of the slab are very different at the end
>>> of
>>> > >> equilibration. Is this an artifact of pressure coupling? Following
>>> is my
>>> > >> equilibration .mdp file. I have tried varying the compressibility
>>> and
>>> > >> tau-p
>>> > >> parameters in the following file. e.g. zero compressibility in x/y
>>> > >> direction or tau-p reduced to 3.
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> > > With pressure coupling, any voids present in the system will be
>>> > > compressed.  If you need to try to preserve some sort of vacuum
>>> layers,
>>> > use
>>> > > NVT.
>>> > >
>>> > > -Justin
>>> > >
>>> > > --
>>> > > ==================================================
>>> > >
>>> > > Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
>>> > > Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
>>> > >
>>> > > Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
>>> > > School of Pharmacy
>>> > > Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
>>> > > University of Maryland, Baltimore
>>> > > 20 Penn St.
>>> > > Baltimore, MD 21201
>>> > >
>>> > > jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
>>> > > http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
>>> > >
>>> > > ==================================================
>>> > > --
>>> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
>>> > >
>>> > > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
>>> > > Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>>> > >
>>> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>> > >
>>> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
>>> or
>>> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> > >
>>> > --
>>> > Gromacs Users mailing list
>>> >
>>> > * Please search the archive at
>>> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>>> > posting!
>>> >
>>> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>> >
>>> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>> >
>>> --
>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>>
>>> * Please search the archive at
>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>>> posting!
>>>
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>
>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>
>>
>>
>