[gmx-users] NPT MD and Berendsen
Chetan Mahajan
chetanvm10 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 23 23:03:43 CEST 2014
Thank you, Dr. Shirts. My pressure coupling type is also semi-isotropic.
So is that simulation worth at all ( since equilibration not on intended
pressure even remotely) or we need to discard the simulation totally ?
Also, this high pressure (and crystal slab movement ) occurs only with
refcoord-scaling option of -com and not with -all. I wonder why.
Thanks.
regards
Chetan
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Michael Shirts <mrshirts at gmail.com> wrote:
> A nonisotropic system will not necessarily end up with exactly the applied
> pressure -- things like surface tension and stresses/strains end up getting
> mixed in and throwing things off.
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Chetan Mahajan <chetanvm10 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Average was taken over 1000 ps. Error estimate is 2.9 which is smaller
> than
> > average pressure of 19.87 bar. Here is the complete statistics:
> >
> > Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
> >
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Temperature 299.968 0.013 1.98625 0.062225 (K)
> > Pressure 19.8699 2.9 726.924 13.5906
> > (bar)
> >
> > Interestingly, average pressure is close to one (0.86 or 0.8 bar) when
> > refcoord scaling of -all is used for position restraints. Above
> simulation
> > where average pressure is so large was carried out with refcoord-scaling
> of
> > -com option. I am simulating TiO2 crystal solvated by water, formate and
> > sodium ion. Now, one important observation is that with -com option,
> > crystal slab moves a distance during change of box dimensions in NPT
> > equilibration, whereas slab DOES NOT move with -all option. However, -com
> > option is more favorable since very less water manage to get on the side
> > surfaces of slab compared to that in -all option, where lot of water get
> on
> > the side which is not desirable.
> >
> > What is happening here? Is it because of slab movement that average
> > pressure is annoyingly large in simulations with -com option? what can be
> > done to rectify or is it okay to proceed anyways?
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> > regards
> > Chetan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Francis Jing <francijing at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > How long was the average taken over? If the error is larger than the
> > > pressure itself, you cannot make judgment.
> > > Generally Berendsen is only inaccurate about the fluctuations, not the
> > mean
> > > value.
> > >
> > >
> > > Francis
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Chetan Mahajan <chetanvm10 at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear All,
> > > >
> > > > I am using Berendsen barostat and thermostat for NPT equilibration MD
> > run
> > > > at 1 atm and 300 K. While it runs fine, average pressure at the end
> of
> > > the
> > > > run is 19 bar. I am confused whether this is way off 1 atm target, or
> > is
> > > > justified recalling gromacs manual that says Berendsen barostat does
> > not
> > > > yield correct thermodynamic ensemble.
> > > >
> > > > IN addition, initial box elongates to have space at both ends in
> > > > z-direction as can be seen in following link:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/dahnyy3zy6vb1xh/AAD5ppxrm18rB3DHZ0Qji0qva
> > > >
> > > > Again, I am not sure if this is a case for concern or just artifact
> of
> > > > using Berendsen.
> > > >
> > > > Is Parrinello-Rahman better than Berendsen, even for initial NPT
> > > > equilibration?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Chetan
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Zhifeng (Francis) Jing
> > > Graduate Student in Physical Chemistry
> > > School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering
> > > Shanghai Jiao Tong University
> > > http://sun.sjtu.edu.cn
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > >
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list