[gmx-users] Energy minimization has stopped, but the forces have not converged
Iris Nira Smith
irisnsmith at comcast.net
Wed Jun 25 16:19:46 CEST 2014
Hello gromacs users,
I have searched the gmx-users archive and have successfully found multiple posts that provide advice on how to troubleshoot my issue. Unfortunately, after trying multiple ways to troubleshoot as suggested by each of these posts, I am still having the same issue.
I successfully mutated a residue in my .pdb file using VMD mutator and am now in the minimization phase using steepest descent step-wise energy minimization. The error I keep getting is as follows:
Tolerance (Fmax) = 1.00000e+04
Number of steps = 2000
Step= 0, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.39138e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 1, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 1.18748e+04, atom= 10021^M
Step= 2, Dmax= 5.0e-03 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 1.73483e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 3, Dmax= 2.5e-03 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 2.44124e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 4, Dmax= 1.2e-03 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 2.88081e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 5, Dmax= 6.2e-04 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.12647e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 6, Dmax= 3.1e-04 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.25644e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 7, Dmax= 1.6e-04 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.32326e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 8, Dmax= 7.8e-05 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.35718e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 9, Dmax= 3.9e-05 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.37432e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 10, Dmax= 2.0e-05 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.38282e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 11, Dmax= 9.8e-06 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.38707e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 12, Dmax= 4.9e-06 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.38920e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 13, Dmax= 2.4e-06 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.39031e+04, atom= 3228^M
Step= 14, Dmax= 1.2e-06 nm, Epot= 5.18534e+14 Fmax= 3.39092e+04, atom= 3228^M
Energy minimization has stopped, but the forces havenot converged to the
requested precision Fmax < 10000 (whichmay not be possible for your system).
It stoppedbecause the algorithm tried to make a new step whose sizewas too
small, or there was no change in the energy sincelast step. Either way, we
regard the minimization asconverged to within the available machine
precision,given your starting configuration and EM parameters.
Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy, butthis is often not
needed for preparing to run moleculardynamics.
You might need to increase your constraint accuracy, or turn
off constraints altogether (set constraints = none in mdp file)
writing lowest energy coordinates.
Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 15 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 10000.
Potential Energy = 5.1853375e+14
Maximum force = 3.3913793e+04 on atom 3228
Norm of force = 6.5862207e+02
I have analyzed my .gro file for steric clashes with atom 3228 (HE2 atom on a tyrosine located 20 amino acids from c-terminal tail) and the only thing that could potentially clash with it is a hydrogen atom on a nearby water which is 1.2 Angstroms away. I first moved x-coordinate of atom 3228 by 0.1nm (or 1.0 Angstrom), but the same error occurred. I then removed that entire water molecule that was near atom 3228, re-ran the energy minimization and the same error occurred. I changed the emtol from 1,000 to 10,000 even to 100,000 and the same error occurred. I then analyzed the energy using g_energy, but the following error occurred:
Program g_energy, VERSION 4.6.3
Source code file: /var/tmp/packages/gromacs-4.6.3/src/gmxlib/enxio.c, line: 828
Energy file g36r_em2.edr not recognized, maybe different CPU?
For more information and tips for troubleshooting, please check the GROMACS
website at http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors
I finally started over and created a new configuration (.gro) file as well as a topology (.top) file, but the same error occurred. Note: I have 13 other mutant model systems that I have run minimization-equilibration successfully but this particular mutant model keeps giving me the same repeated error. The potential energy of this mutant system as well as the force on atom 3228 is rather high. Can you offer any advice or alternate suggestions to troubleshooting this error? Should I run a few steps of CG first and then SD?
Thank you in advance.
Iris N. Smith, Ph.D. Candidate
Briggs Computational Biochemistry/Biophysics Laboratory
University of Houston
A Carnegie-designated Tier One public research university
Email: irisnsmith at comcast.net
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users