[gmx-users] Carbon monoxide topology

[Dr. Vitaly Chaban]

In my opinion, it is an acceptable solution to take these parameters as is.

Especially, if you write some wise words about philosophy of FF
compatibility/trasferability and pairwise interactions for your
methodology section.


Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com> wrote:
> If you're happy that such parameters might work with your intended force
> field, then you only need to build them into a topology. Assuming you have
> some GROMACS experience, check out the relevant parts of chapters 4 and 5
> of the manual.
>
> Mark
> On Jun 25, 2014 4:01 AM, "라지브간디" <rajiv at kaist.ac.kr> wrote:
>
>> Dear Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban,
>>
>>
>> The charges and non-bonded interactions of Carbon monoxide are set to give
>> approximate agreement with the experimental dipole & quardrupole moments (
>> J.E. Straub, M. Karplus, Chemical Physics, 1991).
>>
>>
>> According to this article, with the specific point charges and LJ
>> parameters fit to give good agreement with the multipole moments of CO as
>> well as lattice constant for the Myoglobin with CO structure ( Written for
>>
>>
>> Charmm ff)
>>
>>
>> Hence, i would like to know how do i interpret this values in charmm27 ff
>> in gromacs? Thank you for your concern.
>> Msg: 3
>> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:26:02 +0200
>> From: "Dr. Vitaly Chaban" <vvchaban at gmail.com>
>> To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
>> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Charges & non-bonded interaction values usage
>> in different force fields
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAPXdD+Y4fndZeeL-D+WECT_TmFjkq0Co28DMHbsGcxgDRvCk+A at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>
>> Can you perhaps kindly explain us how "charges and non-bonded
>> interaction values" were "experimentally determined"?
>>
>> Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Rj <rajiv at kaist.ac.kr> wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> >>
>> > Experimentally determined charges and non-bonded interaction values for
>> ligand atoms ( Written in charmm) can be used directly in gromacs provided
>> charmm27.ff ? or does it need any conversion to use it in gromacs based
>> charmm27.ff?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>>
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.