[gmx-users] segmentation fault in vanilla TI calculation, death without further noitice
michael.b
mbx0009 at yahoo.com
Tue Mar 18 09:53:54 CET 2014
dear all,
i performed a simple test for free energy calculations
turning off one water molecule to determine the
chemical potential of water.
I start from a well equilibrated water box. At lambda=1.0
(the fully coupled state) the simulation stops and dies at the
first step without any error messages or warnings. With the other
lambda states (lambda<1.0) things work fine.
I do get a warning from grompp: "For proper sampling of the (nearly)
decoupled
state, stochastic dynamics should be used" which i ignore as the state
lambda=0
is NOT nearly decoupled.
in the log file the energies at step 0 are printed (they look "normal")
then nothing further
stdout is:
[...]
step 0
NOTE: Turning on dynamic load balancing
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
below are my mdp and topology files
any help is appreciated!
thanks,
michael
==================== mdp:
integrator = md
dt = 0.002
nsteps = 100000
comm-grps = System
;
nstxout = 100
nstvout = 0
nstfout = 0
nstlog = 100
nstenergy = 100
;
nstlist = 20
ns_type = grid
pbc = xyz
r_list = 1.2
;cutoff-scheme = Verlet
;
coulombtype = PME
rcoulomb = 1.2
vdw_type = cut-off
rvdw = 1.2
DispCorr = No
;
tcoupl = v-rescale
tc-grps = Water few
tau_t = 0.2 0.2
ref_t = 298.0 298.0
;
gen-vel = yes
gen-temp = 240.0
gen-seed = 45411
;
Pcoupl = berendsen
Pcoupltype = isotropic
tau_p = 0.4
compressibility = 1.0e-5
ref_p = 1.0
;
free-energy = yes
init-lambda-state = 10
delta-lambda = 0
coul-lambdas = 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
vdw-lambdas = 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
calc-lambda-neighbors = 1
sc-alpha = 0.002
sc-r-power = 48
sc-coul = yes
sc-power = 1
sc-sigma = 0.3
couple-moltype = few
couple-lambda0 = none
couple-lambda1 = vdw-q
couple-intramol = no
nstdhdl = 100
constraints = all-bonds
constraint-algorithm = LINCS
continuation = no
==================== top:
#define _FF_AMBER
#define _FF_AMBER03
[ defaults ]
; nbfunc comb-rule gen-pairs fudgeLJ fudgeQQ
1 2 yes 0.5 0.8333
[ atomtypes ]
; name at.num mass charge ptype sigma epsilon
OW 8 16.00 0.0000 A 3.15061e-01 6.36386e-01
HW 1 1.008 0.0000 A 0.00000e+00 0.00000e+00
[ moleculetype ]
; molname nrexcl
wat 2
[ atoms ]
; id at type res nr res name at name cg nr charge mass
1 OW 1 SOL OW 1 -0.834 16.00000
2 HW 1 SOL HW1 1 0.417 1.00800
3 HW 1 SOL HW2 1 0.417 1.00800
[ settles ]
; OW funct doh dhh
1 1 0.09572 0.15139
[ exclusions ]
1 2 3
2 1 3
3 1 2
[ moleculetype ]
; molname nrexcl
few 2
[ atoms ]
; id at type res nr res name at name cg nr charge mass
1 OW 1 few OW 1 -0.834 16.00000
2 HW 1 few HW1 1 0.417 1.00800
3 HW 1 few HW2 1 0.417 1.00800
[ bonds ]
; i j funct length force_constant
1 2 1 0.09572 502416.0
1 3 1 0.09572 502416.0
2 3 1 0.15139 502416.0
;[ constraints ]
; 1 2 1
; 1 3 1
; 2 3 1
[ exclusions ]
1 2 3
2 1 3
3 1 2
[ system ]
; Name
w1k
[ molecules ]
; Compound #mols
wat 999
few 1
--
View this message in context: http://gromacs.5086.x6.nabble.com/segmentation-fault-in-vanilla-TI-calculation-death-without-further-noitice-tp5015242.html
Sent from the GROMACS Users Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list