[gmx-users] refcoord-scaling
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue Mar 25 02:24:10 CET 2014
On 3/24/14, 9:05 PM, Chetan Mahajan wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> My system is TiO2 crystal (2160 atoms position restrained) solvated by 3656
> water molecules, 1 formate anion and 1 sodium ion. Is it true that when
> 'all' option is used, positions of the atoms (meant to be restrained)
> always change?
>
Consider what position restraints are doing. They never guarantee that atoms
won't move; they just apply a biasing potential to disfavor movement. So yes,
your atoms will probably move. The smaller the system, the larger the effect
will likely be. Consider also what reference coordinates are doing. They
define how strong the potential is (distance between current coordinates and
reference). If you're scaling all atoms individually according to the pressure
coupling, the reference moves and therefore the atoms can also move. For larger
systems like proteins, "refcoord_scaling = com" is normal and stable, and
"refcoord_scaling = all" is disfavored. Honestly, I don't know what to expect
for a very small system like yours, but it is likely to be affected to a greater
extent.
If the "all" option gives you a stable simulation that allow for proper
equilibration, then I doubt there is any real problem.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list