[gmx-users] Regarding SwissParam topology
soumadwip ghosh
soumadwipghosh at gmail.com
Wed Jun 10 07:36:21 CEST 2015
Hi,
I have a question about the topology made by SwissParam which is
compatible with CHARMM 27 force field. I hate to bring the same thing up
again and again but I am really doubtful about some of the parameters
created by the above mentioned web server. I have built a topology for
fullerene molecule using it at it looks like
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
LIG 3
[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr resid atom cgnr charge mass
1 CB 1 LIG C 1 0.0000 12.0110
2 CB 1 LIG C1 2 0.0000 12.0110
3 CB 1 LIG C2 3 0.0000 12.0110
4 CB 1 LIG C3 4 0.0000 12.0110
5 CB 1 LIG C4 5 0.0000 12.0110
6 CB 1 LIG C5 6 0.0000 12.0110
7 CB 1 LIG C6 7 0.0000 12.0110
8 CB 1 LIG C7 8 0.0000 12.0110
9 CB 1 LIG C8 9 0.0000 12.0110
10 CB 1 LIG C9 10 0.0000 12.0110
11 CB 1 LIG C10 11 0.0000 12.0110
12 CB 1 LIG C11 12 0.0000 12.0110
13 CB 1 LIG C12 13 0.0000 12.0110
14 CB 1 LIG C13 14 0.0000 12.0110
15 CB 1 LIG C14 15 0.0000 12.0110
16 CB 1 LIG C15 16 0.0000 12.0110
17 CB 1 LIG C16 17 0.0000 12.0110
18 CB 1 LIG C17 18 0.0000 12.0110
19 CB 1 LIG C18 19 0.0000 12.0110
20 CB 1 LIG C19 20 0.0000 12.0110
21 CB 1 LIG C20 21 0.0000 12.0110
22 CB 1 LIG C21 22 0.0000 12.0110
23 CB 1 LIG C22 23 0.0000 12.0110
24 CB 1 LIG C23 24 0.0000 12.0110
25 CB 1 LIG C24 25 0.0000 12.0110
26 CB 1 LIG C25 26 0.0000 12.0110
27 CB 1 LIG C26 27 0.0000 12.0110
The parameters are properly placed in the latter part (kb, force
constant, fu th0 kth ub0 kub th0 kth ub0 kub and so on) in appropriate
directives [ angles ], [ dihedrals ] etc. But the CB atomtype does not
exist as such in the CHARMM 27 ff directory. So how will the atomic
interactions are validated in this case. I am stuck with this problem for a
long time since I generally
1. draw the structure in gaussview 09
2. save it as mol2 file
3. Upload it on SwissParam web server to obtain topology.
Is there anything wrong happening or is there some trivial point I'm
missing out here? At the end of the day, my simulations do run without any
hitch but I struggle to get the desired molecular interaction most of the
time. Is it because the atomtype description itself is vague here and does
not belong to CHARMM 27 ?
If this is indeed the problem, I am thinking of switching over to ParamChem
in order to access CGenFF parameters.
Any kind of help will be hugely appreciated.
Regards,
Soumadwip
IITB
India
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list