[gmx-users] Problem in calculating solvation free energy estimates with gmx sasa -odg
Fabian Thielemann
fabian.thielemann at uranus.uni-freiburg.de
Wed Jun 17 20:49:17 CEST 2015
Hello everyone,
I want to calculate estimates for the solvation free energy using gmx
sasa -odg from gromacs-5.0.4 . I applied it in the same way to two
different types of trajectories. I used gromacs-4.5.6 and the same mdp
file for all simulations, the only difference being structure and
forcefield/water model.
The first type of trajectories was of Alanine Dipeptide at different
temperatures performed in a NVT ensemble using AMBER99SB-ILDN as a
forcefield and TIP3P as water model. In these cases I got regular output.
The second type are trajectories of Trialanine with different
protonation states, performed in a NVT ensemble using OPLS-AA as
forcefield (due to lacking support of differing protonation states in
AMBER) and TIP4P as water model. In this case, using gmx sasa -odg
results in a timerow of constant value 0, although the output in
area.xvg seems to be okay. This was independent of the termini
protonation (i.e. also for standard termini).
I was neither able to find an explanation to this behaviour in the
manual for gmx sasa nor in the paper that was referenced for the
calculation of solvation energies(Eisenberg and McLachlan(1986)).
What exactly does gmx sasa evaluate in this case? What might I have
missed here? If needed, I can send additional information
(mdp/conf/area.xvg/dgsolv.xvg).
From the referenced paper (Eisenberg and McLachlan(1986)), I concluded
that I could also calculate the solvation free energy from the solvent
accessible surface of every atom type and the respective atomic
solvation parameters (ASP). For comparability i would like to know: does
gmx sasa use the ASP values from this paper or does it use other ASP
values, for example taken from later publications of Eisenberg?
Thanks in advance!
Fabian
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list