[gmx-users] Vacuum simulation in GMX 5
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed May 6 19:21:36 CEST 2015
Please don't reply to the entire digest, and please remember to change the
subject line.
On 5/6/15 1:13 PM, Eudes Fileti wrote:
> ; Neighborsearching and short-range nonbonded interactions
> cutoff-scheme = verlet
> nstlist = 20
> ns_type = grid
> pbc = xyz
> rlist = 1.2
> ; Electrostatics
> coulombtype = cut-off
> rcoulomb = 1.2
> ; van der Waals
> vdwtype = cutoff
> vdw-modifier = force-switch
> rvdw-switch = 1.0
> rvdw = 1.2
This input file clearly isn't what you described before, because here you're
using PBC and finite cutoffs.
A plain cutoff for electrostatics with a finite cutoff will be very inaccurate.
> couple-moltype = Pept ; name of moleculet ype to decouple
Does this mean you're decoupling a protein (pept = peptide?). If so, that will
be unavoidably slow, even for short peptides. It also isn't likely to converge
very well.
Running a single molecule in gas phase (which was the original question) is
straightforward:
nstlist = 0
ns_type = grid ; simple also works, doesn't seem relevant
rlist = 0
cutoff-scheme = group
vdwtype = cutoff
rvdw = 0
coulombtype = cutoff
rcoulomb = 0
pbc = no
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list