[gmx-users] first residue in chains warning issue
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Mon May 11 13:43:49 CEST 2015
On 5/10/15 11:36 PM, Ming Tang wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I built a triple helix with 2 GLN and 1 SER being the first residue of the three chains. However, while using pdb2gmx -f 1.pdb -o complex.gro -ignh -ter -ff gromos54a7 -water SPC and choosing NH2 or NH3+ as the start terminus type for GLN-1 and SER-1, I came across the following warnings:
>
> WARNING: WARNING: Residue 1 named GLN (SER) of a molecule in the input file was mapped to an entry in the topology database, but the atom H used in
> an interaction of type angle in that entry is not found in the input file. Perhaps your atom and/or residue naming needs to be fixed.
>
You'll need to provide the full screen output from pdb2gmx; this shouldn't
happen if all the selections are made correctly and chain termini are identified
as they should be.
> Then, I checked the .pdb and .rtp files. The difference between GLN-1/SER-1 and GLN-n/SER-n (n>1) is that GLN-1/SER-1 contains 2 more H atoms.
>
Because you're providing a fully protonated N-terminus (which is fine) with
non-unique atom names (which pdb2gmx will take care of when using -ignh).
> Residue GLN-1 in .pdb
> ATOM 1 N GLN A 1 -10.554 16.421 -0.030 1.00 0.00 N1+
> ATOM 2 CA GLN A 1 -10.080 16.667 1.238 1.00 0.00 C
> ATOM 3 C GLN A 1 -9.305 15.495 1.835 1.00 0.00 C
> ATOM 4 O GLN A 1 -9.636 14.335 1.608 1.00 0.00 O
> ATOM 5 CB GLN A 1 -11.222 17.053 2.210 1.00 0.00 C
> ATOM 6 CD GLN A 1 -11.943 17.895 4.480 1.00 0.00 C
> ATOM 7 NE2 GLN A 1 -11.643 18.268 5.719 1.00 0.00 N
> ATOM 8 OE1 GLN A 1 -13.093 17.905 4.041 1.00 0.00 O
> ATOM 9 CG GLN A 1 -10.784 17.445 3.612 1.00 0.00 C
> ATOM 10 HE2 GLN A 1 -12.366 18.573 6.339 1.00 0.00 H
> ATOM 11 HE2 GLN A 1 -10.694 18.243 6.032 1.00 0.00 H
> ATOM 12 H GLN A 1 -11.086 17.245 -0.422 1.00 0.00 H
> ATOM 13 H GLN A 1 -9.773 16.207 -0.708 1.00 0.00 H
> ATOM 14 H GLN A 1 -11.212 15.593 -0.048 1.00 0.00 H
>
> Parameters in .rtp in gromos54a7
> [ GLN ]
> [ atoms ]
> N N -0.31000 0
> H H 0.31000 0
> CA CH1 0.00000 1
> CB CH2 0.00000 1
> CG CH2 0.00000 1
> CD C 0.29000 2
> OE1 O -0.45000 2
> NE2 NT -0.72000 2
> HE21 H 0.44000 2
> HE22 H 0.44000 2
> C C 0.450 3
> O O -0.450 3
> [ angles ]
> ; ai aj ak gromos type
> -C N H ga_32
> -C N CA ga_31
> H N CA ga_18
> N CA CB ga_13
> N CA C ga_13
> CB CA C ga_13
> CA CB CG ga_15
> CB CG CD ga_15
> CG CD OE1 ga_30
> CG CD NE2 ga_19
> OE1 CD NE2 ga_33
> CD NE2 HE21 ga_23
> CD NE2 HE22 ga_23
> HE21 NE2 HE22 ga_24
> CA C O ga_30
> CA C +N ga_19
> O C +N ga_33
>
> Further, I compared atoms of GLN in .pdb and .rtp, and changed 2 HE into HE21 and HE22, but got the same warnings.
>
You're using -ignh, so all H atoms are ignored per your instruction.
> The simulation can be move forward to EM and NPT smoothly. Does this kind of warning affect the simulation results significantly?
>
If the topology winds up being sane, then it's fine, but warnings from pdb2gmx
are usually weird in the case of normal topologies. Inspect the termini.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list